UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Microsoft Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
☒ | No fee required |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials |
☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
Notice of Annual Shareholders Meeting and
Proxy Statement 2022
December 13, 2022 | Virtual Meeting Site: | |||||
8:30 a.m. Pacific Time | virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSFT22 |
|
Microsofts success must always be aligned with the worlds success, and our ambition must extend beyond technology itself to drive global economic growth while creating a more inclusive, equitable, sustainable, and trusted future.
Satya Nadella, Chairman and CEO
|
Microsoft Corporation (Company) works to conduct business in ways that are principled, transparent, and accountable to our shareholders and other key stakeholders. We believe doing so generates long-term value. As we work to help everyone achieve more, we are committed to improving our world and reporting our progress.
|
Focus for Societal Impact
|
|
||||||
Fundamental to Microsofts mission is realizing our enormous opportunities to create technology that benefits everyone on the planet, as well as the planet itself. As we think about our societal impacts, our current areas of focus include: | ||||||
Trust in technology |
Inclusive economic growth |
Fundamental rights of people |
Sustainability | |||
|
|
|
|
Note About Forward-Looking Statements
|
||||
This Proxy Statement includes estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements may appear throughout this report, including the Proxy Summary and Part 2 Named Executive Officer Compensation. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words believe, project, expect, anticipate, estimate, intend, strategy, future, opportunity, plan, may, should, will, would, will be, will continue, will likely result, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. We describe risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially in Risk Factors, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our Forms 10-K and 10-Q. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise.
|
This Proxy Statement includes several website addresses and references to additional materials found on those websites. These websites and materials are not incorporated by reference herein.
Letter from our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
October 27, 2022
Dear Shareholder,
On behalf of the Board of Directors, it is our pleasure to invite you to the 2022 Annual Shareholders Meeting of Microsoft Corporation (Annual Meeting), on December 13, 2022, beginning at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time. This years Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format through a live webcast. We will provide the webcast of the Annual Meeting at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSFT22. In addition, you will have the option to view the Annual Meeting through Microsoft Teams at microsoft.com/investor. A transcript with video and audio of the entire Annual Meeting will be available on the Microsoft Investor Relations website after the meeting. For more information on how to participate in the meeting, please see Part 5 Information About the Meeting on page 82 in this Proxy Statement.
The Notice of 2022 Annual Shareholders Meeting and this Proxy Statement contain details of the business to be conducted during the Annual Meeting.
Whether or not you participate in the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. We urge you to promptly vote and submit your proxy (1) via the Internet, (2) by phone, or (3) if you received your proxy materials by mail, by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form in the envelope provided for your convenience.
This years shareholders Q&A session will include an opportunity to submit questions. You may submit a question in advance of the meeting at proxyvote.com after logging in with the control number (Control Number) found next to the label for postal mail recipients or within the body of the email sending you the Proxy Statement. Live questions may be submitted online beginning shortly before the start of the Annual Meeting through
virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSFT22.
Thank you for your continued investment in Microsoft.
Sincerely,
Satya Nadella
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Letter from the Board of Directors
October 27, 2022
Dear Shareholder,
For the past several years, we have started this letter noting the significant business, social, and environmental challenges the world faces and the theme continues this year. We remain incredibly proud of the work Microsoft and its employees have done with our customers and partners to help the world use digital technology to address these challenges. As the Company navigated the turbulent global environment, including the continuing impact of the global pandemic and a war in Ukraine, the Board and executive leadership of Microsoft worked closely to consider the needs of our broad range of stakeholders, including employees, customers, the communities we operate in, partners, suppliers, and of course, our shareholders.
Amidst the challenges, Microsoft once again broke records for financial performance in fiscal year 2022. Microsofts leadership and the Company as a whole achieved this through relentless focus on providing technology innovations to make our customers more productive and resilient. As a result, Microsoft delivered strong results for its shareholders, including a return of $46.6 billion in the form of share repurchases and dividends. We look forward to more opportunity ahead as we remain committed to the long-term interests of the Companys shareholders.
Microsoft continued to provide transparency in its progress towards important environmental and social commitments, including our climate goals, our progress towards advancing diversity and inclusion across our workforce, and the Racial Equity Initiative goals we are committed to meet by 2025. For more information on these initiatives and information across a breadth of environmental, social, and governance topics, we encourage you to read the progress reports Microsoft published over the course of the past fiscal year which are available at microsoft.com/transparency and microsoft.com/csr.
Beyond Microsofts own commitments, the Company continues to emphasize its mission to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. A litmus test for the Company is not only what it is doing by or for itself, but what it is doing to help others accomplish more. With that in mind, Microsoft is working to infuse what we have learned from our environmental and social commitments into new tools, products, and services that help our partners and customers. These include Microsoft Cloud for Sustainability, Microsoft Security Solutions, and data privacy tools with Microsoft Priva. This approach not only multiplies the impacts of Microsofts environmental and social commitments, but also drives new innovations and revenues that drive future business growth.
This Proxy Statement describes Microsofts corporate governance policies and practices that foster the Boards effective oversight of the Companys business strategies and practices. A key component to our effective governance is the Boards commitment to provide oversight and perspectives reflecting a diversity of independent views. This years Board nominees represent a wide range of backgrounds and expertise. We believe our diversity of experiences, perspectives, and skills contributes to the Boards effectiveness in managing risk and providing guidance that positions Microsoft for long-term success in a dynamically changing business environment. Of the 12 Board nominees, 11 are independent, which includes our Lead Independent Director and all Committee chairs and members.
Also this year, the Board of Directors changed the name of its Regulatory and Public Policy Committee to the Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee. We believe the new name, which became effective June 1, 2022, better reflects the committees existing responsibility to assist the Board in overseeing policies and programs and related risks that concern important environmental and social matters such as environmental sustainability, privacy, trade, digital safety, responsible artificial intelligence, and competition and antitrust.
The Proxy Statement also includes information about all of the management and shareholder proposals up for a vote at the Companys Annual Meeting. We value your vote and we encourage you to use one of the options laid out in this proxy to vote your shares whether or not you plan to join us for the Annual Meeting. As we look ahead, we continue to see tremendous opportunities for the Companys business and shareholder value creation, with the ability to deliver positive impacts at a global scale. We appreciate your investment in Microsoft and thank you for the trust you place in us and the opportunity to serve you and our Company as directors.
Sincerely,
Your Board of Directors
Notice of 2022 Annual Shareholders Meeting
Date | December 13, 2022 | |||
Time | 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time | |||
Virtual Meeting | This years meeting is a virtual shareholders meeting at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSFT22 | |||
Record Date | October 12, 2022. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. | |||
Proxy Voting | Make your vote count. Please vote your shares promptly to ensure the presence of a quorum during the Annual Meeting. Voting your shares now via the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form will save the expense of additional solicitation. If you wish to vote by mail, we have enclosed an addressed envelope with postage prepaid if mailed in the United States. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares during the Annual Meeting, as your proxy is revocable at your option. We are requesting your vote to: | |||
Items of Business |
Elect the 12 director nominees named in this Proxy Statement
Approve, on a nonbinding advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers (say-on-pay vote)
Ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal year 2023
Vote on six shareholder proposals, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting
Transact other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting | |||
Address of Corporate Headquarters |
One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052 | |||
Meeting Details | See Part 5 Information About the Meeting for details. |
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on December 13, 2022. Our 2022 Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at microsoft.com/investor.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors
Hossein Nowbar
Secretary
Redmond, Washington
October 27, 2022
2022 PROXY STATEMENT i
4 |
|
Proposals to be |
|
|
66 | |||||||||
Management Proposal 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation |
67 | |||||||||||||
|
69 | |||||||||||||
|
|
70
|
| |||||||||||
5 |
|
Information About |
|
|
82 | |||||||||
|
82 | |||||||||||||
|
82 | |||||||||||||
|
82 | |||||||||||||
|
83 | |||||||||||||
|
83 | |||||||||||||
|
83 | |||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||
85 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
85
|
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT iii
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all information you should consider. Please read this entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.
Annual Shareholders Meeting
|
||||
Date: December 13, 2022
Time: 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time
Meeting Agenda: The meeting will cover the proposals listed under Voting Matters and Vote Recommendations below, and any other business that may properly come before the meeting.
|
Place: virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSFT22 | |||
Record Date: October 12, 2022
Mailing Date: This Proxy Statement was first mailed to shareholders on or about |
Voting: Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock of Microsoft Corporation (Company) is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each proposal.
|
Vote in Advance of the Meeting | ||
Vote your shares at proxyvote.com. Have your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card for the 16-digit Control Number needed to vote. | ||
Call toll-free number 1-800-690-6903. | ||
Sign, date, and return the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form. |
Vote Online During the Meeting
| ||
|
See page 82 in Part 5 Information About the Meeting for details on voting your shares during the meeting through proxyvote.com. |
Voting Matters and Vote Recommendations
See Part 4 Proposals to be Voted on During the Meeting for more information.
Board Recommends |
See Page |
|||||||
Management Proposals |
||||||||
Election of 12 Directors |
|
FOR |
|
|
66 |
| ||
Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation (say-on-pay vote) |
|
FOR |
|
|
67 |
| ||
Ratification of the Selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent Auditor for Fiscal Year 2023 |
|
FOR |
|
69 | ||||
Shareholder Proposals |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost/Benefit Analysis of Diversity and Inclusion |
|
AGAINST |
|
|
70 |
| ||
Report on Hiring of Persons with Arrest or Incarceration Records |
|
AGAINST |
|
|
72 |
| ||
Report on Investment of Retirement Funds in Companies Contributing to Climate Change |
|
AGAINST |
|
|
74 |
| ||
Report on Government Use of Microsoft Technology |
|
AGAINST |
|
|
76 |
| ||
Report on Development of Products for Military |
|
AGAINST |
|
|
78 |
| ||
Report on Tax Transparency |
|
AGAINST |
|
|
80 |
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT 1
Our Director Nominees
See Part 1 Governance and our Board of Directors for more information.
The following table provides summary information about each of the 12 director nominees. Each director is elected annually by a majority of votes cast.
Name Occupation |
Age | Director Since |
Independent | Other Public Boards |
Committee Memberships | |||||||||||
AC | CC | ESPP | GN | |||||||||||||
Reid G. Hoffman General Partner, Greylock Partners |
55 | 2017 | Yes | 2 |
|
|||||||||||
Hugh F. Johnston Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, and |
61 | 2017 | Yes | 1 |
|
|||||||||||
Teri L. List Former Executive Vice President and CFO, The Gap, Inc. |
59 | 2014 | Yes | 3 |
|
| ||||||||||
Satya Nadella Chairman and CEO, Microsoft Corporation |
55 | 2014 | No | 1 | ||||||||||||
Sandra E. Peterson Operating Partner, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC |
63 | 2015 | Yes | 1 |
|
| ||||||||||
Penny S. Pritzker Founder and Chairman, PSP Partners, LLC |
63 | 2017 | Yes | 0 |
|
|||||||||||
Carlos A. Rodriguez CEO and Director, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. |
58 | 2021 | Yes | 1 |
|
|||||||||||
Charles W. Scharf CEO, President, and Director, Wells Fargo & Company |
57 | 2014 | Yes | 1 |
|
| ||||||||||
John W. Stanton Founder and Chairman, Trilogy Partnerships |
67 | 2014 | Yes | 2 |
|
|
||||||||||
John W. Thompson Lead Independent Director, Microsoft Corporation; Former CEO and Director, Virtual Instruments Corporation |
73 | 2012 | Yes | 1 |
|
| ||||||||||
Emma N. Walmsley CEO and Director, GSK plc |
53 | 2019 | Yes | 1 |
|
|
||||||||||
Padmasree Warrior Founder, President, and CEO, Fable Group, Inc. |
62 | 2015 | Yes | 1 |
|
AC: Audit Committee CC: Compensation Committee ESPP: Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee (formerly the Regulatory and Public Policy Committee) GN: Governance and Nominating Committee |
Chair Member Financial Expert and Member |
2 |
Executive Compensation Advisory Vote
Our Board recommends that shareholders vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Companys named executive officers (Named Executives) as described in this Proxy Statement (say-on-pay vote), for the reasons below.
Pay for Performance
|
||||
We have executed on our pay for performance philosophy. | ||||||
Over 95% of the annual target compensation opportunity for the CEO is performance-based and over 50% for our other Named Executives
Our annual cash incentive is determined based on pre-established financial targets (70% for our CEO and 50% for our other Named Executives), with the other portion determined based on operational performance in three weighted performance categories
The metrics for our performance stock awards are reviewed annually to ensure they reflect key business developments that drive long-term growth |
Our performance stock awards (PSAs) include a relative total shareholder return (TSR) modifier to reward significant positive outperformance and reduce rewards for underperformance to align executives and shareholders long-term interests
At least 70% of target compensation for our Named Executives was equity-based, with average across all Named Executives over 80%, providing incentives to drive long-term business success and direct alignment with returns to shareholders |
|||||
Sound Program Design
|
||||
We design our executive compensation program to attract, motivate, and retain the key executives who drive our success and industry leadership, while considering individual and Company performance and alignment with the long-term interests of our shareholders. We achieve our objectives through compensation that:
|
||||||
Provides a competitive total pay opportunity
Delivers a majority of pay based on performance
Consists primarily of stock-based compensation |
Enhances long-term focus through multi-year performance requirements or vesting of stock-based compensation
Does not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk taking |
|||||
See Part 2 Named Executive Officer Compensation for more information.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT 3
Business Overview
Our Business Performance
In fiscal year 2022, we continued to achieve strong business results, focusing on enabling the success and earning the trust of our customers. We continue to innovate and expand our offerings to enable the opportunities that the era of intelligent cloud and intelligent edge is creating for our customers. We work to serve as a trusted partner to our customers, accelerating their digital transformations through our key cloud technologies, productivity tools, and artificial intelligence assets.
Fiscal Year 2022 Business Performance Percentages are year-over-year
|
||||
Revenue ( 18%)
$198.3 billion |
Operating Income ( 19%)
$83.4 billion |
Net Income ( 19%)
$72.7 billion |
Diluted Earnings per Share ( 20%)
$9.65 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other highlights from fiscal year 2022 included:
Microsoft Cloud (formerly commercial cloud) revenue increased 32% to $91.2 billion
Office Commercial products and cloud services revenue increased 13%
Office Consumer products and cloud services revenue increased 11%
Linkedln revenue increased 34%
Dynamics products and cloud services revenue increased 25%
Server products and cloud services revenue increased 28%
Windows original equipment manufacturer licensing (Windows OEM) revenue increased 11%
Windows Commercial products and cloud services revenue increased 11%
Xbox content and services revenue increased 3%
Search and news advertising revenue, excluding traffic acquisition costs, increased 27%
Surface revenue increased 3%
Key performance metrics are defined in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.
|
Strong Long-Term Performance
|
||||
Total Shareholder Return* through June 30, 2022
|
Our total shareholder return and total cash returned to
shareholders over the past three years have continued to be strong. |
Total Cash Returned to Shareholders (in billions)
| ||
* Total shareholder return includes reinvestment of dividends.
|
4 |
Governance and Board Best Practices
Our mission to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more is ambitious, and we cannot fulfill it with a narrow or short-term focus. Our adoption of leading governance practices fosters our sustained business success over the long term. Strong corporate governance, informed by participation from our shareholders, is essential to achieving our mission. During fiscal year 2022, independent members of our Board and members of management engaged with a cross-section of shareholders owning approximately 50% of our shares and provided shareholder feedback to the Board.
Our Board believes that having a diverse mix of directors with complementary qualifications, expertise, and attributes is essential to meeting its oversight responsibility. Of our 12 Board nominees, 11 are independent. Having an independent Board is a core element of our governance philosophy.
Our Director Nominees
|
||||
|
Board Diversity
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Global Business
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Leadership
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mergers and Acquisitions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales and Marketing
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Technology
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Independent, Effective Board Oversight
|
||||
Lead Independent Director
11 of 12 director nominees are independent
All committee chairs and members are independent
Board-adopted refreshment commitment to maintain an average tenure of 10 years or less for its independent directors as a group
The Board is committed to actively seeking highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool of potential Board nominees and CEO candidates |
Executive sessions provided for all quarterly Board and committee meetings
Annual Board and committee evaluations, periodically using a third-party facilitator to conduct the evaluations
Director orientation and continuing education and strategy programs for directors
All current Audit Committee members meet the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq) listing standard of financial sophistication, and three members are audit committee financial experts under the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules | |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT 5
Shareholder Rights
|
||||
Single class of stock with equal voting rights
All directors are elected annually
Directors are elected by majority vote in uncontested elections
Confidential voting policy
15% of outstanding shares can call a special meeting
Our Bylaws provide for proxy access by shareholders |
See Part 1 Governance and our Board of Directors and Part 5 Information About the Meeting for more information.
6 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
1. Governance and our Board of Directors
Earning Trust
Earning the trust of our customers, partners, shareholders, and other stakeholders is the foundation of our business success and is fundamental to realizing Microsofts mission to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. The Board of Directors is committed to building trust through strong corporate governance, effective oversight, and strategic engagement. Together, these ensure accountability and position Microsoft for sustained success in a turbulent world.
Like many in the investor community, the Board and Microsofts leaders recognize the interconnections between corporate governance and effective business responses to pressing environmental and social challenges. In considering these challenges, Microsoft and its Board have proactively engaged with investors to learn from their perspectives and to share the Companys approach, as well as considering best practices from our industry peers, partners, customers, and the broader business community. Microsofts Board and management team understand that the work the Company does across a spectrum of environmental and social areas makes an important contribution to the Companys long-term financial performance and growth. We are committed to building and executing on strategies to help foster a healthy planet and advance a more inclusive global economy that fosters additional growth opportunities for everyone.
From our CEO and senior management and throughout our organization, we are working to conduct our business in principled ways that make a significant, positive impact on important global issues. Microsofts Board of Directors and senior leadership appreciate the increasing focus of employees, shareholders, regulators, and other important stakeholders on the effective management and Board oversight of climate change and a broad range of other environmental and social matters. With this in mind, the Board of Directors changed the name of its Regulatory and Public Policy Committee to the Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee. The new name, which became effective June 1, 2022, better reflects the committees existing responsibility to assist the Board in overseeing policies and programs and related risks that concern important environmental and social matters such as environmental sustainability, privacy, trade, digital safety, responsible artificial intelligence, human rights, and competition and antitrust. The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Governance and Nominating Committee also have responsibilities relating to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics.
Concrete Commitments Plus Transparency Drive Results
We hold ourselves accountable by publicly reporting on our policies, practices, and performance to provide our stakeholders visibility into how we are meeting our commitments and responsibilities. We believe our position in the world demands it, and we are confident that it is critical to fostering our long-term business success. Our Reports Hub available at
microsoft.com/transparency provides a consolidated, comprehensive view of our ESG reporting and data ranging from our carbon footprint to workforce demographics to political donations. We work to align our ESG reporting to commonly used global standards such as those provided by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). In addition, we were among the first companies to align our human rights work with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and to adopt the United Nations Guiding Principles Reporting Framework.
Recognizing the interest of shareholders in establishing greater transparency about corporate political contributions, we disclose our political contributions to support candidates and ballot measures and how certain of our trade association membership dues are used for political activities. As part of our commitment to transparency, we developed the Principles and Policies for Guiding Microsofts Participation in the Public Policy Process in the U.S., which focuses on ensuring compliance with applicable federal and state laws and goes beyond compliance to implement what we consider leading practices in corporate accountability, transparency, integrity, and responsibility. The policy is available at microsoft.com/public-policy-engagement.
The corporate governance policies and practices described throughout this Proxy Statement and the effective, engaged Board oversight they foster provide the foundation for all of our ESG commitments.
Engagement with Environmental and Social Topics
Below are four of our most important ESG initiatives that we know are of interest to many of our shareholders and other stakeholders based on feedback we have received. A wide range of information about other environmental and social topics is available at microsoft.com/csr.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
7 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Environmental Sustainability
Our strategy for a sustainable future focuses on climate, ecosystems, water, and waste. In January 2020, we announced a bold commitment and detailed plan to be carbon negative by 2030, and to remove from the environment by 2050 all the carbon we have emitted since Microsofts founding in 1975. This included a commitment to invest $1 billion over four years in new technologies and innovative climate solutions. We built on this pledge by adding commitments to be water positive by 2030, zero waste by 2030, and to protect ecosystems by developing a Planetary Computer. Furthermore, we enhanced transparency by subjecting the data in our annual sustainability report to third-party review and accountability by including progress on sustainability goals as a factor in determining executive pay. Our second year progress report on meeting these commitments is available at aka.ms/MSFTsustainabilityreport2021 and the latest information is available at microsoft.com/environment. Microsofts Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee provides oversight and guidance on Microsofts environmental sustainability strategy and commitments.
Human Capital
We aim to recruit, develop, and retain world-changing talent from a diversity of backgrounds. To foster their success and ours, we seek to create an environment where people can do their best work a place where they can proudly be their authentic selves and where they know their needs can be met. Weve used the concept of a growth mindset to transform our culture. It starts with a belief that everyone can grow and develop; that potential is nurtured, not predetermined; and that anyone can change their mindset. Were also working to transform our human resources function using data, technology, process excellence, and investing in our people. As part of our effort to promote an inclusive culture where all employees have a sense of One Microsoft, we expanded stock eligibility to all Microsoft employees as part of our annual rewards process. This includes all non-exempt and exempt employees and equivalents across the globe, including business support professionals and datacenter and retail employees. For the fiscal year 2022 rewards period, 100% of our employees who were eligible for our annual performance rewards were eligible for stock grants. Weve worked to evolve our employee benefits to be more holistic and inclusive to align to our culture.
Over the past several years weve sought to drive inclusive opportunity by providing increased transparency on our diversity and inclusion (D&I) commitments and making progress in applying and advancing D&I practices across our workplace, including a focus on allyship, behavior modeling, broadening our search for talent, and nurturing employee advocacy groups. Information regarding our diversity and racial equity initiatives is available at microsoft.com/diversity and microsoft.com/racial-equity-initiative, and our general approach to human capital management in the Human Capital Resources section of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Microsofts Board and its Compensation Committee provide oversight and guidance to management on workplace and culture.
Privacy and Cybersecurity
Microsoft is committed to integrating privacy and security into product, service, and technology design. As we articulate in our Privacy Principles, we value, protect, and defend privacy and empower people and organizations to control their data and have meaningful choices in how it is used (see microsoft.com/privacy). We have extended California privacy protections to customers across the U.S. and European Union privacy protections to customers globally. We advocate for strong, comprehensive, and interoperable privacy laws. Microsoft has also continued to provide options for customers to manage and control their data and launched new tools to help organizations identify and manage privacy risks and make smart data handling decisions. More information is available at microsoft.com/privacy. Microsofts Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee provides oversight and guidance on Microsofts privacy policies and programs.
Cybersecurity is a central challenge in the digital age and this past fiscal year we announced our intent to invest $20 billion over five years to accelerate efforts to integrate cybersecurity protection by design and deliver advanced enterprise security solutions. Every service and product line at Microsoft has a dedicated security team as well as cross-company researchers, analysts, and other experts supporting our security products and services. We have established specialized groups such as the Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center focused on threat tracking, and the Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit, which partners with law enforcement agencies around the world to fight cybercrime. Microsofts Board maintains direct oversight over cybersecurity risk. The Board receives and provides feedback on regular updates from management regarding cybersecurity governance processes, the status of projects to strengthen internal cybersecurity, security features of the products and services we provide our customers, and the results of security breach simulations.
8 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Racial Equity Initiative
Microsofts Racial Equity Initiative is a series of commitments designed to address the injustice and inequity experienced by racial and ethnic minorities in the U.S., including Black and African American communities, which centers on three multi-year pillars:
Increasing our representation and strengthening inclusion. We are building on our momentum, adding a $150 million investment to strengthen inclusion and double the number of U.S. Black and African American, and Hispanic and Latinx leaders by 2025.
Evolving our ecosystem. We are using our balance sheet and relationships with suppliers and partners to foster societal change and create new opportunity.
Strengthening our communities. We are using data, technology, and partnerships to help improve the lives of Black and African American people in the U.S., which also includes our employees and their communities.
Details on the components of this important initiative and a fact sheet on our progress two years after its launch are available at microsoft.com/racial-equity-initiative. Microsofts Board, its Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee, and its Compensation Committee provide oversight on many aspects of the Companys commitments through its Racial Equity Initiative.
A Code of Conduct that Drives Compliance and Culture
As our shareholders and other stakeholders increasingly focus on the importance of ESG topics, Microsoft benefits from our longstanding commitments to conducting our business in ways that are principled, transparent, and accountable. The foundation of these commitments is expressed in Microsofts Standards of Business Conduct (our Trust Code) at aka.ms/policiesandguidelines which apply to our employees, officers, Board of Directors, and our subsidiaries and controlled affiliates across the globe. These Standards require not only legal compliance, but also broader commitments to address accessibility, diversity and inclusion, human rights, and privacy. In support of the Trust Code, we strive to build a workplace culture that embraces learning and fosters trust a culture where every employee feels free to ask questions and raise concerns when something doesnt seem right. We extend our high expectations to suppliers who do business with Microsoft, requiring them to uphold the human rights, labor, health and safety, environmental, and business ethics practices prescribed in our Supplier Code of Conduct at aka.ms/scoc.
Board of Directors Oversight Roles
Shareholders elect our Board to serve their long-term interests and to oversee management. Our Board and its committees work closely with management to provide oversight, review, and counsel related to long-term strategy, risks and opportunities, and feedback from shareholders. Our Board works with management to determine our mission and long-term strategy. It also oversees business affairs, integrity, risk management, CEO succession planning, and performs the annual CEO evaluation. Our Board looks to the expertise of its committees to provide strategic oversight in their areas of focus. Significant oversight areas are provided below.
Strategy
Led by our CEO, senior management develops and executes our business strategy. They manage our operations and work to model our desired culture, create innovative products, establish accountability, and control risk. Our CEO and senior management also align our structure, operations, people, policies, and compliance efforts to our mission and strategy.
Overseeing managements development and execution of the Companys strategy is one of our Boards primary responsibilities. The Board works closely with senior management to respond to a dynamic business environment. Management benefits from the insights and perspectives of a diverse mix of directors with complementary qualifications, expertise, and attributes. Senior management and other leaders from across the Company provide business and strategy updates to our Board through regular strategy-focused meetings. At meetings throughout the year, the Board also assesses the strategic alignment of the Companys budget and capital plan and its strategic acquisition and integration process. For large acquisitions such as LinkedIn, GitHub, ZeniMax Media, Nuance Communications, and our pending acquisition of Activision Blizzard, the Board engages management on a broad range of considerations, such as due diligence findings, valuation, and integration planning.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
9 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Risk Oversight
|
||||
The Board of Directors
Effective risk management is critical to Microsofts ability to achieve its mission. The Board exercises direct oversight of strategic risks to the Company and other risk areas not delegated to one of the Boards committees. For example, the Board maintains direct oversight over cybersecurity risk. The Board receives and provides feedback on regular updates from management regarding cybersecurity governance processes, the status of projects to strengthen internal cybersecurity, security features of the products and services we provide our customers, and the results of security breach simulations. The Board also discusses recent incidents throughout the industry and the emerging threat landscape. The committees are charged with specific areas of risk oversight, summarized below, and regularly report back to the full Board.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Audit |
Compensation |
Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
|||||||||||||||||||
With the Board, oversees Microsofts risk management. Oversees the Companys financial statements; compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and corporate policies and controls, including controls over financial reporting, computerized information systems and security; and the independent auditor and internal audit function.
|
Oversees the Companys compensation and benefits programs; human capital management and diversity and inclusion principles and programs; senior management succession planning and compensation; and advises the Board on CEO compensation. | Oversees key non-financial regulatory risks; management policies and programs relating to key environmental and social matters, including climate change and environmental sustainability, competition and antitrust, privacy, trade, digital safety, responsible artificial intelligence, accessibility, human rights, and responsible sourcing; and reviews government relations activities and public policy agenda. | Oversees director selection and succession planning; Board effectiveness and independence, committee functions and charters; adherence to our corporate governance framework; and other corporate governance matters. | |||||||||||||||||||
Company Management
|
||||
The Board, in consultation with each of its committees, oversees Company management in exercising its responsibility managing risk.
The Board of Directors relies upon senior management to supervise risk management activities within the Company. Senior management is responsible for developing a continuously improving culture of risk-aware practices to identify and manage the appropriate level of risk in pursuit of our business objectives. On a regular basis, the Board and its committees engage with our senior management, our chief risk executive and chief compliance officer, and other members of management on risk as part of broad strategic and operational discussions which encompass interrelated risks, as well as on a risk-by-risk basis. Senior management is supported in these efforts through the operation of our enterprise risk management program. The program involves the input of management, the enterprise risk organization, a risk management community within our business teams, and subject matter experts from across the Company, and drives the identification, prioritization, and mitigation of the Companys most significant risks. In addition, risk management is supported by our compliance organization, investigatory teams, internal audit and external audit reviews, and our legal department. Microsoft has also established robust standards of business conduct that apply to all employees globally and provides numerous methods for employees to elevate risk concerns directly to management or through anonymous channels.
|
Culture and Workplace
Our culture isnt what we talk or write about; its what we live every day. Our senior management holds itself accountable for modeling the culture we strive for. We focus on creating a respectful, rewarding, diverse, and inclusive work environment where people can thrive, where they can do their best work, where they can proudly be their authentic selves, guided by our values, and where they know their needs can be met. Key to this environment is cultivating a growth mindset, where our workforce is focused on learning, listening, and growing. We have identified four attributes that allow growth mindset to flourish:
| Obsessing over what matters to our customers |
10 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
| Becoming more diverse and inclusive in everything we do |
| Operating as One Microsoft a unified company instead of multiple siloed businesses |
| Making a difference in the lives of each other, our customers, and the world around us |
Our employee listening systems enable us to gather feedback directly from our workforce to inform our programs and employee needs globally. Seventy percent of employees globally participated in our fiscal year 2022 Employee Signals survey, which covers a variety of topics such as thriving, inclusion, team culture, wellbeing, and learning and development. Throughout the fiscal year, we collected over 75,000 Daily Pulse employee survey responses. During fiscal year 2022, our Daily Pulse surveys gave us invaluable insights into ways we could support employees through the COVID-19 pandemic, addressing racial injustice, the war in Ukraine, and their general wellbeing. In addition to Employee Signals and Daily Pulse surveys, we gain insights through onboarding, internal mobility, leadership, performance and development, exit surveys, internal Yammer channels, employee Q&A sessions, and AskHR Service support. The Board and the Compensation Committee engage with senior management, including Human Resources executives, across a broad range of human capital management topics. Management prepares and reviews with the Board a variety of materials including culture, succession planning and development, compensation, benefits, employee recruiting and retention, and diversity and inclusion. Additionally, each year the Compensation and Audit Committees evaluate managements annual assessment of risk related to our compensation policies and practices, including reviewing the work of managements Sales Incentive Compensation Governance Committee.
Microsoft Board Review of Sexual Harassment and Gender Discrimination Policies
In early 2022, the Board initiated a review of the effectiveness of the Companys sexual harassment and gender discrimination policies and practices. This review responds to an advisory shareholder resolution approved by shareholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting.
Recognizing the importance of these issues to employees, shareholders, and other stakeholders, the Board directed that a third-party assessment be conducted to address the full scope of the proposal passed at the Annual Meeting. Throughout the year, law firm ArentFox Schiff LLP has worked diligently to review and assess the Companys policies and procedures relating to sexual harassment and gender discrimination, including reviewing the Companys internal documents, interviewing executives and employees, and benchmarking against best practices at other companies. Following delivery of the report to the Company, the Board has committed to publish a thorough transparency report for employees, shareholders, and the public, which is planned to be released in mid-November 2022 in advance of Microsofts next Annual Meeting.
Framework
We have developed a corporate governance framework designed to ensure our Board has the authority and practices in place to review and evaluate our business operations and to make decisions independent of management. Our goal is to align the interests of directors, management, and shareholders, and comply with or exceed the requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq) and applicable laws and regulations. This framework establishes the practices our Board follows with respect to, among other things, Board composition and member selection, Board meetings and involvement of senior management, director compensation, CEO performance evaluation, management succession planning, and Board committees. The Board is committed to seeking opportunities for improvements on an ongoing basis. Each summer, the Board updates our corporate governance framework based on shareholder feedback, results from the annual shareholders meeting, the Board and committees annual assessments, governance best practices, and regulatory developments.
Our Corporate Governance Documents
|
||||
Articles of Incorporation Bylaws Corporate Governance Guidelines Director Independence Guidelines Microsoft Finance Code of Professional Conduct Microsoft Standards of Business Conduct (Trust Code) Audit Committee Charter and Responsibilities Calendar
|
Compensation Committee Charter Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee Governance and Nominating Committee Charter Executive Stock Ownership Policy Executive Compensation Recovery Policy Compensation Consultant Independence Standards |
These documents are available on our website at aka.ms/policiesandguidelines.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
11 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Shareholder Rights
Microsoft strives to implement best practices in shareholder rights and to ensure the Company and Board align with the long-term interests of shareholders. We have enhanced our corporate governance framework over time based on input from our Board, shareholders, and other governance experts. Shareholder rights include:
| Single class of shares with each share entitled to one vote |
| Annual election of all directors (unclassified board) |
| Majority voting standard for directors in uncontested elections |
| Confidential voting policy |
| Shareholders of 15% of outstanding shares have the right to call a special meeting |
| Proxy access bylaw allows groups of up to 20 shareholders holding 3% of shares for at least three years to nominate up to two individuals or 20% of the Board (whichever is greater) for inclusion in the proxy statement and ballot for election at an annual shareholders meeting |
Other requirements that align Company and long-term interests of shareholders include:
| Significant stock ownership requirements for directors, executive officers, and other senior leaders. |
| Strong no-fault executive compensation recovery (clawback) policy that applies to executive officers, other senior leaders, and our chief accounting officer. |
| Strict hedging and pledging prohibitions against our directors and executive officers hedging their ownership of Microsoft stock, including by trading in options, puts, calls, or other derivative instruments related to Company equity or debt securities. Directors and executive officers are prohibited from purchasing Microsoft stock on margin, borrowing against Microsoft stock held in a margin account, or pledging Microsoft stock as collateral for a loan. |
| Board tenure policy that seeks to maintain an average tenure of 10 years or less for the Boards independent directors as a group. |
| Public company board service guideline that, absent circumstances that enable the director to have sufficient capacity, generally no director should serve on more than three other public company boards. Directors who are current CEOs should not serve on more than one other public company board. |
Shareholder Engagement
Effective corporate governance includes regular, constructive conversations with our shareholders to proactively seek shareholder insights and to answer shareholder inquiries. We maintain an active dialogue with shareholders to ensure we thoughtfully consider a diversity of perspectives on issues including strategy, business performance, risk, culture and workplace topics, compensation practices, and a broad range of ESG issues. As noted above, the Board updates our corporate governance framework each summer based on a number of inputs, including shareholder feedback.
Our Office of the Corporate Secretary coordinates shareholder engagement with Investor Relations and provides a summary of all relevant feedback to our Board. In fiscal year 2022, members of our Board and management engaged with a cross-section of shareholders owning approximately 50% of Microsoft shares. In addition, throughout the year our Investor Relations group engages with our shareholders, frequently along with Satya Nadella, our Chairman and CEO, and Amy Hood, our CFO.
To communicate broadly with our shareholders, we also seek to transparently share ESG information relevant to our shareholders through our Investor Relations website, our Annual Report, this Proxy Statement, our Reports Hub, and in posts on the Microsoft On the Issues blog.
Board Leadership
The Boards independent directors elected Satya Nadella to the role of Chairman and CEO, and elected John W. Thompson as Lead Independent Director. In his role, Mr. Nadella leverages his deep understanding of the business to elevate the right strategic opportunities and identify key risks and mitigation approaches for the Boards review. As Lead Independent Director, Mr. Thompson retains significant authority including providing input on behalf of the independent directors on Board agendas and schedules, calling meetings of the independent directors, authorizing retention of outside counsel, advisors, or other consultants, setting agendas for executive sessions, leading performance evaluations of the CEO, and overseeing CEO succession planning. Additional information about the role of the Lead Independent Director is available under Key Elements of Board Independence at Microsoft below.
The Board does not have a policy as to whether the Chairman should be an independent director, an affiliated director, or a member of management. The independent directors annually appoint a Chairman of the Board. To ensure robust independent
12 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
leadership on the Board, if the individual appointed as Chairman is not an independent director, or when the independent directors determine that it is in the best interests of the Company, the independent directors will also annually appoint a Lead Independent Director. Our Board believes its current leadership structure is appropriate because it effectively allocates authority, responsibility, and oversight between management and the independent members of our Board. It does this by giving primary responsibility for the operational leadership and strategic direction of the Company to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, while enabling the Lead Independent Director to facilitate our Boards independent oversight of management, promote communication between management and our Board, and support our Boards consideration of key governance matters. The Board believes its programs for overseeing risk, as described in this Part 1 under Risk Oversight, would be effective under a variety of leadership frameworks and therefore do not materially affect its choice of structure.
CEO Succession
A primary responsibility of the Board is planning for CEO succession and overseeing identification and development of other members of the senior leadership team (SLT). The Board and the Compensation Committee work with the CEO and our Chief Human Resources Officer to plan for succession. For the CEO, the succession plan covers identification of internal and external candidates, and professional and leadership development plans for internal candidates. The Board annually reviews the CEO succession plan. The criteria used to assess potential CEO candidates are formulated based on the Companys business strategies, and include strategic vision, leadership, and operational execution. The Board is committed to actively seeking highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool of potential CEO candidates. The Board maintains an emergency succession contingency plan that is reviewed on an annual basis by the Board and Governance and Nominating Committee. The plan identifies roles and responsibilities of individuals who would act if an unforeseen event prevented the CEO from continuing to serve. The Compensation Committee reviews with the CEO and reports to the Board on development and succession plans for the other members of the SLT. The Board may review development and succession planning more frequently as it deems necessary or desirable.
Annual Board and Committee Evaluation Process
The Board is committed to a rigorous self-evaluation process. The Governance and Nominating Committee annually evaluates the performance of the Board. In fiscal year 2022, the evaluation included utilizing a third-party facilitator to seek feedback from each director, and the results were reported to and discussed with the Board. The report includes an assessment of the Boards compliance with the principles in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and identifies areas in which the Board could enhance its performance.
Our evaluation process is designed to elicit feedback on the processes, structure, composition, and effectiveness of the Board. The evaluation results have led to changes to facilitate increased Board effectiveness, including driving clarity on key areas for the Boards focus over the coming year, focus on sustainable growth strategies for the Company, input on management development and succession planning as well as Board composition and recruiting, and input on how to best operationalize Board meetings in a virtual and hybrid environment.
In addition, each committee annually evaluates its performance and reports the results to the Board. In fiscal year 2022, the evaluation of each committee included an assessment of the committees compliance with the principles in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and its charter and identified areas in which the committee could enhance its performance. Results requiring additional review or consideration are discussed at subsequent Board and committee meetings.
Director Attendance
Each quarter, our Board holds two-day meetings comprised of committee and Board meetings. At each quarterly Board meeting, time is set aside for the independent directors to meet without management present. Additional executive sessions are held as needed.
In addition to the quarterly meetings, typically there are other regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings and several special meetings each year. Our Board met nine times during fiscal year 2022. In addition, the Board held periodic meetings dedicated to strategy topics which included presentations and discussions with members of our SLT and other senior management.
Each director nominee attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all fiscal year 2022 meetings of the Board and each committee on which he or she served. In fiscal year 2022, the Board and committees of the Board held a total of 33 meetings. Together, the director nominees attended at least 95% of the combined total meetings of the Board and the committees on which they were members in fiscal year 2022.
Directors are expected to attend the annual shareholders meeting, if practicable. All directors attended the 2021 Annual Meeting.
Director Orientation and Continuing Education
Our orientation programs are designed to familiarize new directors with our businesses, strategies, and policies and assist new directors in developing Company and industry knowledge to optimize their service on the Board.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
13 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Regular continuing education programs enhance the skills and knowledge directors use to perform their responsibilities. These programs may include internally developed programs or programs presented by third parties.
Director Stock Ownership Policy
To align the interests of our directors and shareholders, our directors are required to own Microsoft shares equal in value to at least three times the base annual retainer (cash and stock) payable to a director. Each director must retain 50% of all net shares (post-tax) from the retainer until reaching the minimum share ownership requirement. Stock deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors counts toward the minimum ownership requirement. Each of our directors complied with our stock ownership policy in fiscal year 2022.
Derivatives Trading, Hedging, and Pledging
Our directors and executive officers are prohibited from trading in options, puts, calls, or other derivative instruments related to Microsoft equity or debt securities. They also are prohibited from purchasing Microsoft common stock on margin, borrowing against Microsoft common stock held in a margin account, or pledging Microsoft common stock as collateral for a loan. Employees, other than executive officers, are generally permitted to engage in transactions designed to hedge or offset market risk.
Board Independence
The Boards independence enables it to be objective and critical in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a substantial majority of our directors will be independent. The independent members of the Board annually appoint a Lead Independent Director to facilitate the Boards oversight of management, promote communication between management and our Board, engage with shareholders, and lead consideration of key governance matters.
Key Elements of Board Independence at Microsoft
|
||||
11 of 12 director nominees are independent We are committed to maintaining a substantial majority of directors who are independent of the Company and management. Except for our Chairman and CEO, Satya Nadella, all director nominees are independent.
Board tenure We are committed to board refreshment. To strike a balance between retaining directors with deep knowledge of the Company and adding directors with a fresh perspective, the Board seeks to maintain an average tenure of 10 years or less for its independent directors as a group. The average tenure for our independent director nominees is 6.1 years. The average tenure is 6.3 years if Mr. Nadella is included.
Board diversity The Board is committed to actively seeking highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool of potential Board nominees and CEO candidates.
Executive sessions of independent directors At each quarterly Board meeting, time is set aside for the independent directors to meet in executive session without management present. Additional executive sessions are held as needed.
Committee independence Only independent directors are members of the Boards committees. Each committee meets regularly in executive session.
Independent compensation consultant The compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee is independent of the Company and management as required by the Compensation Consultant Independence Standards.
Lead Independent Director The Lead Independent Director has a clearly defined set of responsibilities, significant authority, and provides independent Board leadership. John W. Thompson was selected by the independent members of the Board to serve as Lead Independent Director. Key responsibilities and authority include:
Leads the Board meetings when the Chairman and CEO is not present
Reviews and approves the agenda and schedule for Board meetings
Calls meetings of the independent directors
Chairs executive sessions and coordinates activities of the independent directors
Leads the Boards annual CEO performance evaluation
Coordinates Board oversight of CEO succession planning, including maintenance of an emergency succession plan
Chairs the annual shareholders meeting
Acts as liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman and CEO
Authorizes retention of outside counsel, advisors, or other consultants who report directly to the Board
When requested, represents the Board with internal and external audiences including shareholders
|
14 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Board Committees
To support effective corporate governance, our Board delegates certain responsibilities to its committees, who report on their activities to the Board. These committees have the authority to engage legal counsel or other advisors or consultants as they deem appropriate to carry out their responsibilities. Our Board has four standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, an Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee, and a Governance and Nominating Committee.
The table below provides summary information about each director nominee followed by a summary of each committees responsibilities. Each committee has a charter describing its specific responsibilities which can be found on our website at aka.ms/boardcommittees.
Membership
Director |
Audit | Compensation | |
Environmental, Social, and Public Policy |
|
|
Governance and Nominating |
| ||||
Reid G. Hoffman |
||||||||||||
Hugh F. Johnston |
||||||||||||
Teri L. List |
||||||||||||
Satya Nadella |
||||||||||||
Sandra E. Peterson |
||||||||||||
Penny S. Pritzker |
||||||||||||
Carlos A. Rodriguez |
||||||||||||
Charles W. Scharf |
||||||||||||
John W. Stanton |
||||||||||||
John W. Thompson |
||||||||||||
Emma N. Walmsley |
||||||||||||
Padmasree Warrior |
||||||||||||
Number of meetings in fiscal year 2022 |
9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||
Chair Member Financial Expert and Member |
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
15 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Audit
|
||||
Oversee the work of our accounting function and internal control over financial reporting
Oversee internal auditing processes
Inquire about significant risks, review our policies for enterprise risk assessment and risk management, and assess the steps management has taken to control these risks
Review with management policies, practices, compliance, and risks relating to our investment portfolio
Review with management the Companys business continuity and disaster preparedness planning
Review compliance with significant applicable legal, ethical, and regulatory requirements, including those relating to regulatory matters that may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or internal control over financial reporting
The Audit Committee is responsible for the compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent auditor engaged to issue audit reports on our consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee relies on the expertise and knowledge of management, the internal auditor, and the independent auditor in carrying out its oversight responsibilities.
The Board has determined that each Audit Committee member has sufficient knowledge in financial and auditing matters to serve on the Audit Committee. All current members of the Audit Committee meet the Nasdaq listing standard of financial sophistication and three are audit committee financial experts under SEC rules.
As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, members of the Audit Committee ordinarily may not serve on over three public company audit committees (including Microsofts). In calculating service on a public company board or audit committee, service on a board or audit committee of a parent and its substantially-owned subsidiary counts as service on a single board or audit committee. Any Audit Committee members service on over three public company audit committees will be subject to the Boards determination that the member is able to effectively serve on the Companys Audit Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board considered Ms. Lists service on four public company audit committees, including her professional qualifications, former experience as a public company chief financial officer, and the nature of and time involved in her service on other boards. Following such review, the Board determined that Ms. List is able to effectively continue to serve on the Companys Audit Committee.
|
16 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Compensation
|
||||
Assist our Board in establishing the annual goals and objectives of the CEO.
Establish the process for annually reviewing the CEOs performance.
Recommend our CEOs compensation to the independent members of our Board for approval.
Approve annual compensation, and in consultation with the CEO, oversee performance evaluations, for the non-CEO members of the SLT.
Review and discuss with the CEO and report to the Board development and corporate succession plans for the non-CEO members of the SLT.
Oversee administration of the Companys equity-based compensation and retirement plans.
Monitor and evaluate the compensation and benefits structure of Microsoft as the Committee deems appropriate, including policies regarding SLT compensation.
Oversee and advise the Board and management about Company programs for diversity and inclusion and human capital management.
Periodically review the compensation paid to non-employee directors and make recommendations to our Board for any adjustments.
Oversee the process and review the results of investigations of any sexual harassment complaints against senior officers. The Committee will report to the full Board on the conclusions of any investigation that results in a founded determination and the disciplinary and other actions taken.
Our senior executives for Human Resources support the Compensation Committee in its work. The Committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees and to one or more designated members of the Committee. The Committee may delegate to one or more executive officers the authority to make grants of equity-based compensation to eligible individuals who are not executive officers and to administer the Companys equity-based compensation plans. The Committee has delegated to senior management the authority to make stock award grants to employees who are not members of the SLT or Section 16 officers and to administer the Companys equity-based compensation plans.
Independent compensation consultant The Compensation Committee retained Pay Governance LLC as an independent compensation consultant throughout fiscal year 2022. The consultant advises the Committee on marketplace trends in executive compensation, management proposals for compensation programs, and executive officer compensation decisions. The consultant also evaluates compensation for non-employee directors, the next levels of senior management, and equity compensation programs generally. The consultant discusses recommendations to the Board on CEO compensation with the Committee, and is directly accountable to the Committee. To maintain the independence of the consultants advice, the firm does not provide services to Microsoft other than those described above. The Committee has adopted Compensation Consultant Independence Standards which can be viewed on our website at aka.ms/policiesandguidelines. These standards require that the Committee annually assess the independence of its compensation consultant. A consultant satisfying the following requirements will be considered independent. The consultant (including each individual employee of the consultant providing services):
Is retained and terminated by, has its compensation fixed by, and reports solely to, the Compensation Committee
Is independent of the Company
Will not perform any work for Company management except at the request of the Compensation Committee Chair and in the capacity of the Committees agent
Should not provide any unrelated services or products to the Company and its affiliates or management, except for surveys purchased from the consultants firm
In assessing the consultants independence, the Compensation Committee considers the nature and amount of work performed for the Committee during the year, the nature of any unrelated services performed for the Company, and the fees paid for those services in relation to the firms total revenue. The consultant annually prepares for the Committee an independence letter providing assurances and confirmation of the consultants independent status under the standards. The Committee believes that Pay Governance has been independent during its service for the Committee.
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
17 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Environmental, Social, and Public Policy
|
||||
Assist the Board in overseeing the Companys key non-financial regulatory risks that may have a material impact on the Company and its ability to sustain trust with customers, employees, and the public
Oversee management policies and programs relating to key environmental and social matters including climate change and environmental sustainability, competition and antitrust, privacy, trade, digital safety, responsible artificial intelligence, accessibility, human rights, and responsible sourcing
Review our government relations activity and political activities and expenditures
Review our public policy agenda and position on significant public policy matters
|
Governance and Nominating
|
||||
Determine and recommend the slate of director nominees for election to our Board during the annual shareholders meeting.
Identify, recruit, and recommend candidates for the Board.
Review and make recommendations to the Board about the composition of Board committees.
Annually evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the Board.
Annually assess the independence of each director.
Monitor adherence to, review, develop, and recommend changes to our corporate governance framework.
Review and provide guidance to the Board and management about the framework for the Boards oversight of, and involvement in, shareholder engagement.
Annually review the charters of Board committees and, after consultation with the respective committees, recommend to the Board appropriate changes.
Oversee the process and review the results of investigations of any sexual harassment complaints against members of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee will report to the full Board on the conclusions of any investigation that results in a founded determination and the disciplinary and other actions taken.
|
18 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Director Selection and Qualifications
Shareholders elect our Board of Directors annually. In making its annual director nominations determination, the Boards objective is to recommend a group of directors that can best ensure the continuing success of our business and represent shareholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience and perspectives.
The Governance and Nominating Committee recommends to the Board director candidates for nomination and election during the annual shareholders meeting or for appointment to fill vacancies. The Committee works with our Board to determine the characteristics, skills, and experience for the Board as a whole and its individual members with the objective of having a board with diverse backgrounds, skills, and experience. In making its recommendations to our Board, the Committee considers the qualifications of individual director candidates applying the Board membership criteria described below. The Committee retains any search firm involved in identifying potential candidates and approves their fees.
For all directors, we require an independent mindset, integrity, personal and professional ethics, business judgment, and the ability and willingness to commit sufficient time to the Board. Our Board considers many factors in evaluating the suitability of individual director candidates, including their general understanding of global business, sales and marketing, finance, and other disciplines relevant to the success of a large, publicly traded company; understanding of our business and technology; educational and professional background; personal accomplishment; and national, gender, age, and ethnic diversity.
This Proxy Statement includes a table summarizing the key qualifications, skills, and attributes currently most relevant to the decision to nominate candidates to serve on the Board. As the Board strives to maintain a diverse set of skills and attributes, it also expects that each member will be able to understand and contribute meaningfully to the oversight of the range of material business, risk, and regulatory issues the Company faces. Managements responsibility includes educating and communicating to the Board in a way that enables effective oversight of this broad set of issues. The Board is committed to actively seeking highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool from which new candidates are selected. We work with our search firm to ensure the candidate slate provided to the Committee includes diverse candidates.
The Board does not believe that directors should expect to be re-nominated annually. In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Committee considers the directors participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board, the results of the most recent Board evaluation, and meeting attendance.
When the Committee recruits new director candidates, that process typically involves either a search firm or a member of the Committee contacting a prospect to assess interest and availability. A candidate will then meet with members of the Board and Mr. Nadella, and then meet with members of management as appropriate. At the same time, the Committee and the search firm will contact references for the candidate. A background check is completed before a final candidate recommendation is made to the Board.
Shareholders have previously elected all Board nominees.
The Committee assesses its efforts to maintain an effective and diverse board as part of its regular responsibilities, which include annually:
| Reporting to our Board on the performance and effectiveness of the Board |
| Presenting to our Board individuals recommended for election to the Board at the annual shareholders meeting |
| Assessing the Committees own performance |
Shareholder Recommendations and Nominations of Director Candidates
Recommendations
The Governance and Nominating Committee considers shareholder recommendations for candidates for the Board of Directors using the same criteria described above. The name of any recommended candidate for director, together with a brief biographical sketch, a document indicating the candidates willingness to serve if elected, and evidence of the nominating shareholders ownership of Company stock must be sent to the attention of MSC 123/9999, Office of the Corporate Secretary, Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, 98052-6399.
Nominations
Our Bylaws provide for proxy access shareholder nominations of director candidates by eligible shareholders. A shareholder who wishes to formally nominate a candidate, whether for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement or not, must follow the procedures described in Article 1 of our Bylaws. Appropriately nominated proxy access candidates or candidates who comply with both our Advanced Notice Bylaw Provisions and the SECs Rule 14a-19 will be included in the Companys proxy statement and ballot.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
19 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Our Board of Directors believes that having a diverse mix of directors with complementary qualifications, expertise, and attributes is essential to meeting its oversight responsibility.
Director Nominee Qualifications, Expertise, and Attributes
|
||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Board Diversity Representation of gender, ethnic, or other perspectives that expand the Boards understanding of the needs and viewpoints of our customers, partners, employees, governments, and other stakeholders worldwide.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Leadership of a financial firm or management of the finance function of an enterprise, resulting in proficiency in complex financial management, capital allocation, and financial reporting processes.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Experience driving business success in markets around the world, with an understanding of diverse business environments, economic conditions, cultures, and regulatory frameworks, and a broad perspective on global market opportunities.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Extended leadership experience for a significant enterprise, resulting in a practical understanding of organizations, processes, strategic planning, and risk management. Demonstrated strengths in developing talent, planning succession, and driving change and long-term growth.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A history of leading growth through acquisitions and other business combinations, with the ability to assess build or buy decisions, analyze the fit of a target with a companys strategy and culture, accurately value transactions, and evaluate operational integration plans.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Experience developing strategies to grow sales and market share, build brand awareness and equity, and enhance enterprise reputation.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A significant background working in technology, resulting in knowledge of how to anticipate technological trends, generate disruptive innovation, and extend or create new business models. May include expertise in cybersecurity governance or technology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
20 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Board Diversity
The table below summarizes the key qualifications, skills, and attributes most relevant to the decision to nominate candidates to serve on the Board. A mark indicates a specific area of focus or expertise on which the Board particularly relies. Not having a mark does not mean the director does not possess that qualification or skill. Our director nominees biographies describe each directors background and relevant experience in more detail.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
21 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Following are biographies for the 12 directors nominated by the Board for election during the 2022 Annual Meeting.
Reid G. Hoffman | ||||||
Age: 55 | Director since: 2017 | Birthplace: United States | Independent
|
Experience: Greylock Partners (2009-present) (venture capital firm) General Partner (2009-present) Reinvent Capital (2019-present) Advisory Partner (2019-present) LinkedIn Corporation (2003-2016) Co-founder and Chairman (2003-2016) Executive Chairman (2009) Chief Executive Officer (2003-2007 and 2008-2009) President, Products (2007-2008) PayPal Holdings, Inc. (2000-2002) Executive Vice President (2000-2002)
|
Microsoft Committees: Environmental, Social, and Public Policy
Other Public Company Directorships: Joby Aviation, Inc. Aurora Innovation, Inc.
Former Public Company Directorships Held in the Past Five Years: Reinvent Technology Partners Z |
Hugh F. Johnston | ||||||
Age: 61 | Director since: 2017 | Birthplace: United States | Independent
|
Experience: PepsiCo, Inc. (1987-1999 and 2002-present) (food and beverage company) Vice Chairman (2015-present) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2010-present) Executive Vice President, Global Operations (2009-2010) President, Pepsi-Cola North America (2007-2009) Various positions of increasing authority Merck & Co., Inc. (1999-2002) Vice President, Retail Marketing, Merck-Medco Managed Care LLC (1999-2002)
|
Microsoft Committees: Audit (Chair)
Other Public Company Directorships: HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Former Public Company Directorships Held in the Past Five Years: None |
Board Diversity | Financial | Global Business |
Leadership | Mergers and Acquisitions |
Sales and Marketing |
Technology |
22 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Teri L. List | ||||||
Age: 59 | Director Since: 2014 | Birthplace: United States | Independent
|
Experience: The Gap, Inc. (2016-2020) (clothing and accessories retailer) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2016-2020) Dicks Sporting Goods, Inc. (2015-2016) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2015-2016) Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (2013-2015) Senior Advisor (2015) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2013-2015) Senior Vice President (2013) The Procter & Gamble Company (1994-2013) Senior Vice President and Treasurer (2009-2013) Various positions of increasing authority (1994-2009) |
Microsoft Committees: Audit Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Directorships: Danaher Corporation DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. Visa Inc.
Former Public Company Directorships Held in the Past Five Years: Oscar Health, Inc.
Other Positions: Former Trustee, Financial Accounting Foundation Former Practice Fellow, Financial Accounting Standards Board
|
Satya Nadella | ||||||
Age: 55 | Director Since: 2014 | Birthplace: India
|
Experience: Microsoft Corporation (1992-present) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2021 to present) Chief Executive Officer and Director (2014-2021) Executive Vice President, Cloud and Enterprise (2013-2014) President, Server and Tools (2011-2013) Senior Vice President, Online Services Division (2009-2011) Senior Vice President, Search, Portal, and Advertising (2008-2009) Various positions of increasing authority (1992-2008)
|
Microsoft Committees: None
Other Public Company Directorships: Starbucks Corporation
Former Public Company Directorships None |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
23 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Sandra E. Peterson | ||||||
Age: 63 | Director Since: 2015 | Birthplace: United States | Independent
|
Experience: Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC (2019-present) (investment firm) Operating Partner (2019-present) Johnson & Johnson (2012-2018) Group Worldwide Chair and member of the Executive Committee (2012-2018) Bayer CropScience AG (2010-2012) Chairman of the Board of Management (2010-2012) Member of Board of Management (2010) Bayer HealthCare LLC (2005-2010) Executive Vice President and President, Medical Care (2009-2010) President, Diabetes Care Division (2005-2009) Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (1999-2004) Group President of Government (2003-2004) Senior Vice President, Health Businesses (2001-2003) Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategy (1999-2001)
|
Microsoft Committees: Compensation (Chair) Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Directorships: Zymergen, Inc.
Former Public Company Directorships Held in the Past Five Years: Covetrus, Inc. |
Penny S. Pritzker | ||||||
Age: 63 | Director Since: 2017 | Birthplace: United States | Independent
|
Experience: United States Secretary of Commerce (2013-2017) PSP Partners, LLC (present) (private investment firm) Founder and Chairman (present) Pritzker Realty Group (present) Co-founder and Chairman (present) Inspired Capital Partners (present) Co-founder and Chairman (present) Artemis Real Estate Partners (present) Co-founder (present) The Parking Spot (1998-2011) Co-founder and Chairman (1998-2011) Vi Senior Living (1987-2011) Founder and Chairman (1987-2011)
|
Microsoft Committees: Environmental, Social, and Public Policy (Chair)
Other Public Company Directorships: None
Former Public Company Directorships Held in the Past Five Years: None
Other Positions: Co-founder, Pritzker Traubert Foundation |
Board Diversity | Financial | Global Business |
Leadership | Mergers and Acquisitions |
Sales and Marketing |
Technology |
24 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Carlos A. Rodriguez | ||||||
Age: 58 | Director since: 2021 | Birthplace: Cuba | Independent
|
Experience: Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (1999-present) (human capital management solutions provider) Chief Executive Officer and Director (2011-present) President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director (2011) Various positions of increasing authority (1999-2011) Vincam Group, Inc. (1996-1999) (acquiredby Automatic Data Processing, Inc. in 1999) Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer (1997-1999) Vice President, Mergers & Acquisitions (1996-1997) Vice President, Operations (1996)
|
Microsoft Committees: Audit
Other Public Company Directorships: Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
Former Public Company Directorships Held in the Past Five Years: None |
Charles W. Scharf | ||||||
Age: 57 | Director Since: 2014 | Birthplace: United States | Independent
|
Experience: Wells Fargo & Company (2019-present) (banking and financial services company) Chief Executive Officer and President (2019-present) The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (2017-2019) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2018-2019) Chief Executive Officer and Director (2017) Visa Inc. (2012-2016) Chief Executive Officer and Director (2012-2016) JPMorgan Chase & Co. (2004-2012) Managing Director, One Equity Partners, private investment arm (2011-2012) Chief Executive Officer of Retail Financial Services (2004-2011) Bank One Corporation (2000-2004) Chief Executive Officer of the Retail Division (2002-2004) Chief Financial Officer (2000-2002) Citigroup Inc. (1999-2000) Chief Financial Officer of the Global Corporate and Investment Bank Division (1999-2000)
|
Microsoft Committees: Compensation Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Directorships: Wells Fargo & Company
Former Public Company Directorships Held in the Past Five Years: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Visa Inc. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
25 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
John W. Stanton | ||||||
Age: 67 | Director Since: 2014 | Birthplace: United States | Independent
|
Experience: Trilogy Partnerships (2005-present) (investment company) Founder and Chairman (2005-present) Clearwire Corp. (2008-2013) Chairman of the Board (2011-2013) Interim Chief Executive Officer (2011) Board member (2008-2011) Western Wireless Corporation (1992-2005) Founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman (1992-2005) VoiceStream Wireless Corporation (1995-2003) Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (1995-2003) |
Microsoft Committees: Audit Environmental, Social, and Public Policy
Other Public Company Directorships: Costco Wholesale Corporation Trilogy International Partners, Inc.
Former Public Company Directorships None
Other Positions: Chairman, First Avenue Entertainment LLLP,
|
John W. Thompson | ||||||
Age: 73 | Director Since: 2012 | Birthplace: United States | Independent
|
Experience: Microsoft Corporation (2012-present) Lead Independent Director (2021-present) Independent Board Chair (2014-2021) Lead Independent Director (2012-2014) Virtual Instruments Corporation (2010-2016) Chief Executive Officer and Director (2010-2016) Symantec Corp. (1999-2011) Chairman of the Board (1999-2011) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (1999-2009) IBM Corporation (1971-1999) General Manager, IBM Americas (1996-1999) Various positions of increasing authority (1971-1996)
|
Microsoft Committees: Governance and Nominating (Chair) Environmental, Social, and Public Policy
Other Public Company Directorships: Illumina, Inc.
Former Public Company Directorships None
Other Positions: Partner, Lightspeed Venture Partners |
Board Diversity | Financial | Global Business |
Leadership | Mergers and Acquisitions |
Sales and Marketing |
Technology |
26 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Emma N. Walmsley | ||||||
Age: 53 | Director Since: 2019 | Birthplace: United Kingdom | Independent
|
Experience: GSK plc (2010-present) (healthcare company) Chief Executive Officer (2017-present) Chief Executive Officer, Consumer Healthcare (2015-2016) President, Consumer Healthcare (2012-2015) President, Consumer Healthcare Europe (2010-2012) LOreal, S.A. (1994-2010) General Manager, Consumer Products, China (2007-2010) Global Brand Head, Maybelline, USA (2002-2007) UK General Manager, Garnier/Maybelline (1999-2002) Various positions of increasing authority (1994-1999)
|
Microsoft Committees: Compensation Environmental, Social, and Public Policy
Other Public Company Directorships: GSK plc
Former Public Company Directorships Held in the Past Five Years: None |
Padmasree Warrior | ||||||
Age: 62 | Director Since: 2015 | Birthplace: India | Independent
|
Experience: Fable Group, Inc. (2019-present) (curated fiction and non-fiction for mobile devices) Founder, President, and Chief Executive Officer (2019-present) NIO Inc. (2015-2018) Chief Development Officer (2015-2018) Board member (2015-2018) NIO USA, Inc. (2015-2018) Chief Executive Officer and Director (2015-2018) Cisco Systems, Inc. (2008-2015) Strategic Advisor (2015) Chief Technology and Strategy Officer (2012-2015) Chief Technology Officer, Senior Vice President, Engineering and General Manager Global Enterprise segment (2010-2012) Chief Technology Officer (2008-2010) Motorola, Inc. (1999-2007) Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer (1999-2007)
|
Microsoft Committees: Compensation
Other Public Company Directorships: Spotify Technology S.A.
Former Public Company Directorships None |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
27 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
How to Communicate with our Board
We will transmit shareholder communications related to corporate governance and other Board matters to the Board, a committee of the Board, or a director as designated in your message. Communications relating to other topics, including those that are primarily commercial in nature, will not be forwarded.
@ |
askboard@microsoft.com |
|
MSC 123/9999 Office of the Corporate Secretary Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052-6399 |
|
Concerns about accounting or auditing matters or possible violations of our Standards of Business Conduct should be reported under the procedures outlined in the Microsoft Standards of Business Conduct, which is available on our Microsoft integrity website at microsoft.com/legal/compliance/integrity.
Director Independence Guidelines
Our Board has adopted director independence guidelines to assist in determining each directors independence. These guidelines are available on our website at aka.ms/policiesandguidelines. The guidelines either meet or are more restrictive than the definition of independent director in the listing requirements of Nasdaq and applicable laws and regulations. The guidelines identify categories of relationships the Board has determined would not affect a directors independence and therefore are not considered by the Board in determining director independence.
Following the director independence guidelines, each year and before a new director is appointed, the Board must affirmatively determine a director has no relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as a director. Annually, each director completes a detailed questionnaire that provides information about relationships that might affect the determination of independence. Management provides the Governance and Nominating Committee and Board with relevant known facts and circumstances of any relationship bearing on the independence of a director or nominee that is outside the categories permitted under the director independence guidelines. The Committee then completes an assessment of each director considering all known relevant facts and circumstances concerning any relationship bearing on the independence of a director or nominee. This process includes evaluating whether any identified relationship otherwise adversely affects a directors independence and affirmatively determining that the director has no material relationship with Microsoft, another director, or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with our Company.
The Governance and Nominating Committee also considers the tenure of a director, and for longer serving directors, whether the duration of service impacts the directors independence from management, as demonstrated by the directors relationship with management and the directors participation in Board and committee deliberations. The Board seeks to maintain an average tenure of 10 years or less for its independent directors as a group.
Based on the review and recommendation by the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board analyzed the independence of each director and nominee. The Board determined that Mses. List, Peterson, Pritzker, Walmsley, and Warrior, and Messrs. Hoffman, Johnston, Rodriguez, Scharf, Stanton, and Thompson meet the standards of independence under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the director independence guidelines, and applicable Nasdaq listing standards, including that each member is free of any relationship that would interfere with his or her individual exercise of independent judgment. In making its independence determination, the Committee and Board considered ordinary course transactions between Microsoft and certain related entities, for instance the purchase of software licenses by companies of which a director is an executive officer, and purchases by Microsoft of goods and services from such companies. In reaching that conclusion with respect to Ms. Pritzker, the Committee and Board considered transactions between LinkedIn, a subsidiary of Microsoft, and 3Q Digital, Inc., a digital marketing company (3Q), which accounted for more than 5% of 3Qs annual revenue for its 2019, 2020, and 2021 fiscal years. 3Q has provided digital marketing services for LinkedIn since 2015. In 2019, trusts for the benefit of Ms. Pritzker and her family acquired an indirect majority interest in 3Q. In making its determination regarding Ms. Pritzkers independence, the Committee and Board noted that Ms. Pritzker is not a director or officer of, and holds no direct equity ownership interest in, 3Q or any of its parent organizations. The Committee and Board further noted that Ms. Pritzker has recused herself from participation in any decisions related to 3Q or the Trusts investment therein and does not otherwise have the ability to control the Trusts investment or other decisions regarding 3Q. Ms. Pritzker was not involved in the negotiation of the commercial agreements between 3Q and LinkedIn. In May 2021, the commercial relationship between LinkedIn and 3Q was terminated.
28 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
We are a global company with extensive operations in the U.S. and many foreign countries. Every year, we spend billions of dollars for goods and services purchased from third parties. The authority of our employees to purchase goods and services is widely dispersed. Because of these wide-ranging activities, there may be transactions, business arrangements, or relationships with businesses and other organizations in which one of our directors, executive officers, nominees for director, or an owner of 5% or more of our stock (5% shareholders) or their immediate families, may also be a director, executive officer, or investor, or have some other direct or indirect material interest (related entities). We will refer to these transactions with related entities as related-party transactions where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a director, executive officer, nominee for director or 5% shareholders, or immediate family member has a direct or indirect material interest.
Related-party transactions have the potential to create actual or perceived conflicts of interest between Microsoft and its directors, executive officers, nominees for director or 5% shareholders, or their immediate family members. The Audit Committee has established a written policy and procedures for review and approval of related-party transactions. If a related-party transaction subject to review involves directly or indirectly a member of the Audit Committee (or an immediate family member or domestic partner), the remaining Committee members will conduct the review. In evaluating a related-party transaction, the Audit Committee considers, among other factors:
| The goods or services provided by or to the related party |
| The nature of the transaction and the costs to be incurred by Microsoft or payments to Microsoft |
| The benefits associated with the transaction and whether comparable or alternative goods or services are available to Microsoft from unrelated parties |
| The business advantage Microsoft would gain by engaging in the transaction |
| The significance of the transaction to Microsoft and to the related party |
| Managements determination that the transaction is in the best interests of Microsoft |
To receive Audit Committee approval, a related-party transaction must have a Microsoft business purpose and be on terms that are fair and reasonable to Microsoft and be as favorable to Microsoft as would be available from non-related entities in comparable transactions. The Audit Committee also requires that the transaction meet the same Microsoft standards that apply to comparable transactions with unaffiliated entities.
During fiscal year 2022, there were ordinary course transactions between Microsoft and certain related entities, for instance the purchase of software licenses by companies of which a director is an executive officer and purchases by Microsoft of goods and services from such companies. None of these transactions constituted a related-party transaction that required approval by the Audit Committee.
The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the regular annual retainer paid to non-employee directors and makes recommendations for adjustments, as appropriate, to the full Board. Our objective for compensation to non-employee directors is to award the majority of compensation in equity and to make meaningful adjustments every few years, rather than smaller adjustments that are more frequent. In fiscal year 2022, we increased director compensation for the first time since fiscal year 2015, as shown below. At the same time, without changing the total retainers paid to Mr. Thompson, we determined that he should receive the annual Base Retainer and Committee-based retainer in his capacity as a non-employee director, and the Lead Independent Director retainer was reduced so that the aggregate payments to Mr. Thompson did not change. Our CEO, Mr. Nadella does not receive pay for serving as a director or as Board Chairman.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
29 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Structure for Non-Employee Directors through November 29, 2021 | ||
Regular Retainers |
| |
Annual Base Retainer (TOTAL) |
$325,000 | |
Cash |
$125,000 | |
Stock Award |
$200,000 | |
Committee Retainers (cash) |
| |
Annual Committee Chair Retainer |
$15,000 | |
Annual Audit Committee Chair Retainer |
$45,000 | |
Annual Audit Committee Non-Chair Member Retainer |
$15,000 | |
Lead Independent Director Retainer |
| |
Annual Lead Independent Director Retainer (TOTAL Board and Committee service) |
$425,000 | |
Cash |
$125,000 | |
Stock Award |
$300,000 |
Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Structure for Non-Employee Directors from November 30, 2021 | ||
Regular Retainers |
| |
Annual Base Retainer (TOTAL) |
$360,000 | |
Cash |
$125,000 | |
Stock Award |
$235,000 | |
Committee Retainers (cash except stock award for Governance and Nominating Committee) |
| |
Annual Audit Committee Chair Retainer |
$45,000 | |
Annual Audit Committee Non-Chair Member Retainer |
$15,000 | |
Annual Compensation Committee Chair Retainer |
$35,000 | |
Annual Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee Chair Retainer |
$25,000 | |
Annual Governance and Nominating Committee Chair Retainer |
$25,000 | |
Lead Independent Director Retainer (stock award in addition to other retainers) |
$40,000 |
The Company reimburses reasonable expenses incurred for Board-related activities. Directors may participate in our corporate matching gift program for charitable donations.
Director retainers are paid quarterly in arrears. Quarterly periods are measured beginning with the annual shareholders meeting. At the end of each quarterly period, we pay 25% of the total annual retainer to each director. The number of shares awarded each quarterly period is determined by dividing the dollar value of the stock award by the market price of our common stock as of the last business day of the period. Retainers are pro-rated for directors who join or leave the Board or have a change in Board role during a quarterly period.
Directors may elect to defer and convert to deferred stock awards all or part of their annual cash retainer, and to defer receipt of all or part of their annual stock awards retainer under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Amounts deferred are maintained in bookkeeping accounts that are deemed invested in Microsoft common stock, and dividends paid on deemed investments are also deemed to be invested in our common stock. We calculate the number of shares credited by dividing the amount deferred by the closing market price of our common stock on the originally scheduled payment date. Accounts in the plan are distributed in shares of Microsoft common stock, with payments either in installments beginning on separation from Board service or in a lump sum paid no later than the fifth anniversary after separation from Board service.
30 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Director Compensation
This table describes the cash and stock award portions of the annual retainer paid to each non-employee director who served in fiscal year 2022. Mr. Nadella received no compensation as a director or Board Chairman. He is excluded from the table because we fully describe his compensation in Part 2 Named Executive Officer Compensation.
Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash¹ ($) |
Stock Awards² ($) |
All Other Compensation3 ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||
Reid G. Hoffman4 |
125,000 | 217,500 | 0 | 342,500 | ||||||||||||
Hugh F. Johnston |
170,000 | 217,500 | 15,000 | 402,500 | ||||||||||||
Teri L. List5 |
140,000 | 217,500 | 15,000 | 372,500 | ||||||||||||
Sandra E. Peterson6 |
150,000 | 217,500 | 15,000 | 382,500 | ||||||||||||
Penny S. Pritzker7 |
145,000 | 217,500 | 15,000 | 377,500 | ||||||||||||
Carlos A. Rodriguez8 |
69,524 | 117,500 | 0 | 187,024 | ||||||||||||
Charles W. Scharf |
125,000 | 217,500 | 0 | 342,500 | ||||||||||||
John W. Stanton |
140,000 | 217,500 | 15,000 | 372,500 | ||||||||||||
John W. Thompson9 |
125,000 | 304,565 | 15,000 | 444,565 | ||||||||||||
Emma N. Walmsley |
125,000 | 217,500 | 12,363 | 354,863 | ||||||||||||
Padmasree Warrior10 |
125,000 | 217,500 | 0 | 342,500 |
(1) | The value of fractional shares under stock awards that are paid in cash are reported in the Stock Awards column. |
(2) | The aggregate award value in the Stock Awards column for each director represents four quarterly awards. The first two quarters representing a grant date fair value under FASB ASC Topic 718 of $50,000 and $58,750 for the final two quarters, with exceptions as follows: Mr. Thompson received a prorated award with a grant date fair value under FASB ASC Topic 718 of $79,565 for the first quarter and $75,000 for the last three quarters. Mr. Rodriguez joined the Board effective November 30, 2021, so was not eligible to receive a stock award for the first two quarters. |
(3) | Amounts in this column represent matching charitable contributions under our corporate giving program in fiscal year 2022, which matches director gifts up to $15,000 per calendar year. |
(4) | Mr. Hoffman elected to defer his cash and stock compensation. The compensation deferred converted into 1,128 shares of our common stock. |
(5) | Ms. List elected to defer her cash and stock compensation for the first three quarters. The compensation deferred converted into 835 shares of our common stock. |
(6) | Ms. Peterson elected to defer her cash and stock compensation. The compensation deferred converted into 1,212 shares of our common stock. |
(7) | Ms. Pritzker elected to defer her cash and stock compensation. The compensation deferred converted into 1,195 shares of our common stock. |
(8) | Mr. Rodriguez joined the Board effective as of the shareholder meeting on November 30, 2021. He became a member of the Audit Committee on December 8, 2021 and received prorated Audit Committee retainer as a result. He elected to defer his cash and stock compensation. The compensation deferred converted into 642 shares of our common stock. |
(9) | Mr. Thompson elected to defer his stock compensation. The compensation deferred converted into 1,001 shares of our common stock. |
(10) | Ms. Warrior elected to defer a portion of her cash compensation. The compensation deferred converted into 204 shares of our common stock. |
Lead Independent Director Compensation
Mr. Thompson served as Lead Independent Director during fiscal year 2022. Mr. Thompsons compensation reflects the additional time commitment for the Lead Independent Director role compared to other independent directors, which includes:
| Leads the Board meetings when the Chairman and CEO is not present |
| Reviews and approves the agenda and schedule for Board meetings |
| Calls meetings of the independent directors |
| Chairs executive sessions and coordinates activities of the independent directors |
| Leads the Boards annual CEO performance evaluation |
| Coordinates Board oversight of CEO succession planning, including maintenance of an emergency succession plan |
| Chairs the annual shareholders meeting |
| Acts as liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman and CEO |
| Authorizes retention of outside counsel, advisors, or other consultants who report directly to the Board |
| When requested, represents the Board with internal and external audiences including shareholders |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
31 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
2. Named Executive Officer Compensation
A Letter from the Compensation Committee
Dear Shareholder,
During fiscal year 2022, COVID-19 continued to disrupt our communities and workplaces around the globe, and despite those challenges, we are again proud of the Companys efforts to deliver another year of strong financial performance. Microsofts diverse product portfolio, durable business models, and integrated, modern technology stack uniquely positioned the Company for continued progress during the past year.
Our executive compensation program is designed to achieve strong alignment between our long-term strategic goals and our shareholders interests, while providing a competitive total pay opportunity to attract and retain the key executives who drive our business and develop the next generation of leaders. We are committed to continually reviewing our compensation program to ensure it is grounded in our pay-for-performance philosophy.
Our Company continued with its active shareholder outreach program during fiscal year 2022, engaging investors representing approximately 50% of our shares outstanding. This included calls led by the Compensation Committee Chair and Lead Independent Director focused on soliciting our shareholders perspectives on our compensation structure and disclosure. Those calls have engaged investors holding over 30% of Microsofts outstanding shares in the two-plus years of the Committees current structure. We carefully considered recent and past shareholder feedback as we made changes to our fiscal year 2022 compensation program.
During fiscal year 2022, we addressed the need to provide ongoing incentives to Mr. Nadella following the final vest in February 2021 of the long-term performance stock award granted at Mr. Nadellas 2014 promotion to CEO. Shareholders expressed a desire to ensure the ongoing retention and motivation of Mr. Nadella and the independent members of the Board continue to have high confidence in Mr. Nadellas exceptional leadership of Microsoft. The Board acted to ensure that his incentive compensation is aligned to long-term shareholder interests, motivational and appropriately positioned versus market given the Companys relative size and performance. After a thorough analysis of our options, we concluded that it would be best to provide Mr. Nadellas compensation using our existing executive compensation plan framework to ensure an ongoing strong alignment to the incentives of his senior leadership team (SLT), while delivering 100% of his equity compensation via performance stock awards (up from 70% in fiscal year 2021). As a result of this decision, over 95% of Mr. Nadellas annual target compensation opportunity is now performance-based. For fiscal year 2022, we set Mr. Nadellas target performance stock award at $50,000,000, which we believe is the appropriate level of equity compensation for a leader with his extraordinary capabilities and responsibilities and for a company of Microsofts extraordinary scale and complexity. This change to our CEO compensation is described in more detail below.
We also continue to look carefully at emerging investor expectations and best practices for addressing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) commitments in our executive compensation program. We have been early leaders in this practice having included an assessment of CEO and SLT progress on culture and diversity and inclusion since 2016 as part of the operational assessment component of the annual cash incentive under our Executive Incentive Plan. With senior managements focus on achieving Microsofts ambitious carbon reduction commitments, the CEO and SLTs contributions to the execution of our sustainability goals are also assessed as part of this operational assessment component. Beginning with fiscal year 2022, we renamed the Culture and Organizational Leadership category of the operational assessment component as the Culture, Diversity & Sustainability category to enhance clarity on how ESG results affect the pay of our named executives. Now, all ESG results for incentive purposes are considered under this category. We continue to seek feedback from investors and compensation experts as we thoughtfully consider future enhancements that connect executive compensation to Microsofts environmental and social commitments.
We believe that these recent changes to our compensation program build on our efforts to thoughtfully align pay with the interests of our shareholders and incentivize long-term growth. We appreciate your support and welcome your feedback on our compensation program reflected in the following pages and look forward to continued dialogue in the future.
Sincerely,
The Compensation Committee
Sandra E. Peterson (Chair)
Charles W. Scharf
Emma N. Walmsley
Padmasree Warrior
32 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information about our fiscal year 2022 compensation program for our fiscal year 2022 Named Executives. The content of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis is organized into six sections:
Table of Contents
|
||||
p. 33 | ||
p. 37 | ||
p. 39 | ||
p. 42 | ||
p. 45 | ||
p. 52
|
Microsofts executive compensation program is thoughtfully designed by our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors to align to Microsofts long-term strategy, and over the years we have evolved our executive pay program while maintaining an overarching compensation philosophy aimed at achieving strong alignment between our long-term strategic goals and our shareholders interests.
Our current executive compensation program has been structured to align with the business strategy that has been defined by the Board and Mr. Nadella, and each year the Compensation Committee reviews the existing incentive structure, taking into consideration investor feedback, business performance, and our strategic roadmap, in considering the efficacy of further enhancements.
Section 1 Performance Update
Achieving Strong Financial Results
Our strong business execution throughout fiscal year 2022 achieved the following financial performance:
Fiscal Year 2022 Business Performance Percentages are year-over-year
|
||||
Revenue ( 18%) |
Operating Income ( 19%) |
Net Income ( 19%) |
Diluted Earnings per Share ( 20%) | |||
$198.3 billion |
$83.4 billion | $72.7 billion | $9.65 | |||
|
Other highlights from fiscal year 2022 included:
| Microsoft Cloud (formerly commercial cloud) revenue increased 32% to $91.2 billion |
| Office Commercial products and cloud services revenue increased 13% |
| Office Consumer products and cloud services revenue increased 11% |
| LinkedIn revenue increased 34% |
| Dynamics products and cloud services revenue increased 25% |
| Server products and cloud services revenue increased 28% |
| Windows original equipment manufacturer licensing (Windows OEM) revenue increased 11% |
| Windows Commercial products and cloud services revenue increased 11% |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
33 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
| Xbox content and services revenue increased 3% |
| Search and news advertising revenue, excluding traffic acquisition costs, increased 27% |
| Surface revenue increased 3% |
Key performance metrics are defined in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.
Superior Shareholder Returns
|
||||
Annual Cumulative Total Shareholder Return during Mr. Nadellas CEO tenure: MSFT vs. S&P 500 Feb. 4, 2014 through June 30, 2022 (includes reinvestment of dividends) |
|
Driving Business Success
When in 2014 the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Nadella as the third Chief Executive Officer in its history, Microsoft had revenues of $86.8 billion, net income of $22.1 billion, and diluted earnings per share of $2.63. Those figures have, respectively, more than doubled ($198.3 billion), more than tripled ($72.7 billion), and almost quadrupled ($9.65) in the intervening years. In addition to another year of consistently strong financial performance, Mr. Nadella and his leadership team have positioned Microsoft to continue to drive performance for years to come. They have achieved this through:
| Growing and diversifying the business through relentless innovation |
| Enhancing synergies between our own products and services and creating a portfolio of industry clouds to multiply opportunities for customers to realize value |
| Partnering with other technology providers to remove friction and accelerate customers digital transformations and executing strategic acquisitions to broaden our reach |
Leadership in Innovation and Growth
The mission statement Mr. Nadella articulated at the outset of his tenure, to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more, along with his focus on transforming the Company culture, has animated the growth of our products and services portfolio.
34 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Below are examples that illustrate the innovative products, services, and partnerships driving momentum and growth across the Company.
Azure. Azure cloud computing is perhaps the most powerful example of how Microsofts innovation is driving growth. Azure is a natural outgrowth of Microsofts DNA as a platform company. It was built to unlock a vast array of infrastructure as a service (IaaS), platform as a service (PaaS), and software as a service (SaaS) solutions. We have developed and continue to create scores of offerings that build on Azures capabilities and multiply its usefulness. Offerings include Azure OpenAI Service for machine learning; Azure Synapse for data storage, integration, and analytics; and Power BI to glean and access data insights from across the enterprise.
Mr. Nadella has stated we aimed to build Azure as the worlds computer. Weve built more datacenter regions than any other provider, delivering faster access to cloud services while addressing critical data residency requirements, and have announced our intention to launch ten regions over the next year. In fiscal year 2022, the number of Azure deals exceeding $100 million more than doubled year-over-year. Microsofts cloud revenue, which includes Azure and other cloud offerings such as Office 365 Commercial and Dynamics 365, exceeded $91 billion.
Security. Our security business has grown dramatically from innovation and adroitly recognizing market opportunities. Our security portfolio focuses not only on Microsoft technology, but on customers entire technology estate. We deliver advanced security solutions for a variety of platforms outside our own, which integrate more than 50 different categories in security, compliance, identity, device management, and privacy. We secure other vendors clouds and productivity solutions. We can serve as a comprehensive security vendor for customers entire range of interoperating products from Microsoft and other companies. Through organic growth and acquisitions, our security business reached annualized revenue of over $15 billion. In fiscal year 2022 we announced our intent to invest $20 billion over five years to advance our security solutions and protect customers.
Advertising. Our advertising business continues to grow through differentiated offerings across our online properties, as well as through strategic acquisitions. In fiscal year 2022, LinkedIn Marketing Solutions surpassed $5 billion in annual revenue for the first time. We are creating new monetization opportunities for marketers and publishers on the web, while assuring consumer privacy and strong data governance. Bing and our personalized Windows content feed, Microsoft Start, continue to grow engagement. Our acquisition of Xandr in 2022 brings into our fold one of the worlds largest marketplaces for premium advertising.
Power Platform. Power Platform is making it even easier for teams of professional and citizen developers to build end-to-end business solutions together. With nearly 25 million monthly active users, Power Platform comprises an end-to-end suite of tools to automate workflows, create apps, build virtual agents, and analyze data. Because non-IT professionals can learn and use Power Platform, subject matter experts who are closest to the workflow can use low-code or no-code tools to do problem solving in business processes.
GitHub. GitHub is a source of dynamic innovation and a key element of Microsofts position as the premier developer platform. GitHub Copilot is a first-of-its-kind artificial intelligence-based programmer that helps developers write better code faster. When enabled, Copilot writes up to 35% to 40% of the code, greatly increasing developer productivity. GitHub expanded features bring it from just a source code management platform to an entire suite for development, security, and operations, with features such as continuous integration/continuous delivery and package management in our Codespaces service. GitHub Advanced Security allows developers to scan code for vulnerabilities, secrets, tokens, and other issues that can compromise secure code, and ensure all dependencies and open-source components are up to date.
Product Synergies and Industry Clouds
Microsoft is continually building connections between our products and services in ways that create powerful new levels of utility.
Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams, our premier communication and collaboration application, is one example of how we develop these synergies. Our metaverse service, Mesh, integrates with Teams to enable shared immersive experiences from informal watercooler conversations to structured whiteboarding sessions. Microsoft Digital Contact Center Platform brings together Teams, Dynamics 365, and enterprise AI capabilities from Nuance, to deliver customer engagement in the entire range of channels. New integrations between Dynamics 365 Intelligent Order Management and Teams help people collaborate seamlessly to minimize supply chain disruptions. Teams itself has become a first-class platform for application development, as the number of third-party and line of business Teams applications with active usage increased by 40% in fiscal year 2022.
Intelligent data. A foundational element of Azure is data storage and management. That is, however, only a first step toward the comprehensive digital transformation companies need to remain competitive. We designed our Intelligent Data Platform to unlock productivity and value from an enterprises data estate. Power Platform enables customers to gain insights from their data,
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
35 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
automate and build low-code solutions to business processes, and facilitate routine inquiries at scale through virtual agents. Our analytics and machine learning tools drive productivity gains by transforming unstructured data into actionable information that supports operational reliability, effective supply chain management, and rapid product innovation.
Industry clouds. We recognize different industries have particular business requirements. Our industry clouds bring together capabilities across the entire Microsoft Cloud, along with industry-specific customizations, to improve time to value, increase agility, and lower costs. Our Clouds for Healthcare, Financial Services, Manufacturing, and Retail leverage customized combinations of products and services to overcome business challenges specific to each of those verticals. From data governance and artificial intelligence to metaverse applications, our industry clouds help companies solve common challenges and allocate resources to their highest value and most differentiating activities.
Because sustainability is an existential priority for our society and for every business today, we offer a Cloud for Sustainability to help any organization track its carbon footprint and other metrics to help meet its sustainability goals. Our Cloud for Nonprofit helps charitable organizations unlock the power of their data to achieve more transformative impact.
Partnering and Acquisitions
We partner with many of the leading enterprise technology companies to empower customers and grow market opportunities together. In July 2022, we announced a new service to accelerate adoption of Oracle workloads on Azure, making Microsoft the only public cloud with simplified direct access to Oracle databases running on Oracle Cloud. Through our collaboration with SAP, weve built a pathway for customers to migrate their SAP workloads to the cloud to take advantage of lower costs, increased agility, and reduced risk. Through the Azure VMware Solution, we have enabled enterprises to seamlessly move VMware-based workloads from their datacenters to Azure and integrate their VMware environments with Azure. In our rapidly growing security business, we have over 15,000 partners in our ecosystem, more than anyone else in the industry. Now, instead of one conversation on productivity, another on infrastructure, and yet another on business applications, our customer conversation can revolve around how all these products more seamlessly merge, whether its our software alone, or a combination of ours and partner solutions.
Mr. Nadella has been bold and visionary in finding strategic acquisitions that build on and enhance our core offerings. LinkedIn, with its services that help both employers and workers network, grow professionally, and find one another, has shown consistent and strong growth since we acquired it in 2016. Four distinct businesses at LinkedIn surpassed the billion-dollar revenue threshold in fiscal year 2022. Similarly, GitHub has continued to strengthen its position as the preferred platform for developers since its acquisition in 2018.
More recently, the acquisition of Nuance Communications, consummated in 2022, will enable organizations across industries to accelerate their business goals with our security-focused, cloud-based solutions infused with powerful, vertically optimized artificial intelligence. Our goal is for customers to benefit from enhanced consumer, patient, clinician, and employee experiences, ultimately improving productivity and financial performance. Nuance is a key catalyst for the growth of our healthcare industry vertical.
And, in January 2022, we announced our agreement to acquire Activision Blizzard as an investment to make it easier for people to play great games wherever, whenever, and however they want. We expect the transaction will increase innovation in content creation and reduce constraints on distribution. It also significantly expands our presence in mobile, the largest segment in the gaming business.
These examples of innovation, synergy, and partnership are far from exhaustive. They provide a view, however, into the diverse and innovative set of technologies and products Microsoft has built under Mr. Nadellas leadership. It is a multi-faceted engine of growth that provides more avenues for continued success. The uses for Microsofts technology toolbox are as expansive as our customers imaginations. Mr. Nadella has quite intentionally conditioned Microsofts success on that of our customers while providing the platform and technologies on which our customers will achieve it. This is a durable strategy that can thrive through economic cycles, business disruptions, and the ever-increasing pace of change that characterizes the current global marketplace, precisely because Microsoft enables companies and individuals to successfully address those very challenges.
Environmental and Social Leadership
As we articulate in Part 1, Governance and our Board of Directors, we believe Microsofts strategic environmental and social commitments play an important role in fostering Microsofts long-term success and value creation for our shareholders. We provide extensive reporting on our environmental and social performance and progress towards our commitments at microsoft.com/transparency. Among just a few of this years highlights:
| Microsofts five-year, $20 billion commitment to advance our security solutions includes $150 million to help U.S. government agencies upgrade cybersecurity protections. We also enhanced our global skilling initiative with new commitments to help the U.S. and 24 other countries with substantial cybersecurity workforce shortages to grow their number of skilled candidates and increase diversity in the cybersecurity field. |
36 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
| The Company continues transparently tracking and reporting annually on our progress towards our sustainability commitments, sharing our progress, challenges, and learnings as we pursue our commitments to become carbon negative, water positive, zero waste, and to build a Planetary Computer. |
| Microsoft supported important customer privacy protections in the new Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework and committed to go beyond it by meeting or exceeding all the requirements it outlines for companies (aka.ms/EUPolicyBlog-DataAgreement). |
| Microsoft released our Responsible AI Standard (aka.ms/RAI), which helps operationalize Microsofts six Responsible AI principles (aka.ms/RAIApproach) through goals, tools, and practices to support them. |
| While much more work remains, we made progress increasing diverse representation and inclusion at Microsoft and invested in our employees to advance our culture and environments where people can do their best work. |
Section 2 Executive Compensation Program Changes
Shareholder Engagement
Our executive compensation program is grounded in a compensation philosophy aimed at achieving strong alignment between our long-term strategic goals and our shareholders interests. Feedback received from our shareholders through ongoing engagement discussions informs our Compensation Committees deliberations as it reviews the incentive structures in place on an ongoing basis.
Our Board and our Compensation Committee deeply value the continued interest of and feedback from our shareholders on our executive compensation program and are committed to maintaining an active dialogue with them to ensure their perspectives are thoughtfully taken into account.
We carefully consider both the level of voting support from our shareholders on our say-on-pay vote, as well as comments from |
Shareholder Engagement
|
|||||||
Engaged with shareholders owning approximately 50% of shares in FY22
|
||||||||
Compensation Committee Chair and Lead Independent Director annually engage with large shareholders
|
||||||||
shareholders, when evaluating our executive compensation program. At the 2021 Annual Meeting, over 95% of the votes cast supported our advisory resolution on the compensation of our Named Executives (say-on-pay vote).
As in prior years, in fiscal year 2022 we continued our active shareholder engagement program, discussing compensation and a broad range of ESG issues with shareholders representing approximately 50% of our outstanding shares, including participation by our Compensation Committee Chair and Lead Independent Director. Together, the Compensation Committee Chair and Lead Independent Director have solicited our shareholders perspectives on our compensation structure and disclosure in engagements with investors holding over 30% of Microsofts outstanding shares in the two-plus years of the Committees current structure.
CEO Compensation
During fiscal year 2022, we addressed the need to provide ongoing incentives to Mr. Nadella following the February 2021 final vest of long-term performance stock award granted at Mr. Nadellas 2014 promotion to CEO. Mr. Nadellas criticality to Microsofts ongoing success was a regular focus of feedback we received from shareholders, which is consistent with our independent Board members high confidence in Mr. Nadellas exceptional leadership of Microsoft.
In reviewing Mr. Nadellas compensation, the independent members of the Board were determined to ensure that his incentive compensation is aligned to long-term shareholder interests, motivational and appropriately positioned versus market given the Companys relative size and performance. After a thorough analysis of options, our independent Board members concluded that it would be best to deliver Mr. Nadellas compensation under our existing Executive Incentive Plan framework to ensure an ongoing strong alignment to the incentives of the senior leadership team, while delivering 100% of his equity compensation via performance stock awards (up from 70% in fiscal year 2021). For fiscal year 2022, Mr. Nadellas target performance stock award was set at $50,000,000, which our independent Board members concluded is the appropriate level of equity compensation for a leader with his extraordinary capabilities and responsibilities and for a company of Microsofts extraordinary scale and complexity.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
37 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
The changes to Mr. Nadellas incentive compensation structure for fiscal year 2022 are shown in the table below:
Pay Element |
FY21 Elements / Metrics / Weightings | FY22 Elements / Metrics / Weightings | ||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentives |
Financial Incentive Plan Revenue (35%) Incentive Plan Operating Income (35%) |
|
70% |
|
Financial (no change) Incentive Plan Revenue (35%) Incentive Plan Operating Income (35%) |
|
70% |
| ||||
Operational Product & Strategy (10%) Customers & Stakeholders (10%) Culture & Organizational Leadership (10%) |
|
30% |
|
Operational (new) Product & Strategy (10%) Customers & Stakeholders (10%) Culture, Diversity & Sustainability* (10%)
* New name for fiscal year 2022 |
|
30% |
| |||||
Long-Term Equity |
Performance Stock Award Three, one-year performance periods with following metrics: Commercial Cloud Revenue (33%) Commercial Cloud Subscribers (32%) Teams Monthly Active Usage (20%) Xbox Game Pass Subscribers (5%) Surface Revenue (5%) LinkedIn Sessions (5%) |
|
70% |
|
Performance Stock Award (new) Three, one-year performance periods with Microsoft Cloud Revenue* (30%) Microsoft Cloud Subscribers Growth* (20%) Teams Monthly Active Usage Growth (20%) Xbox Game Pass Subscribers Growth (10%) Windows OEM Revenue Growth (10%) LinkedIn Sessions (10%)
* New name for fiscal year 2022 |
|
100% |
| ||||
Relative TSR Modifier: 3-Year Relative TSR modifier (0.75 1.5x) as compared to the S&P 500 If Microsofts TSR is positive and above the 60th percentile, payout modifier is above 1x, with up to 50% upside at the 80th percentile or above If Microsofts TSR is below the 40th percentile, payout modifier is below 1x, with up to 25% downside at 20th percentile or below
|
| |||||||||||
Stock Award Four-year ratable vesting |
|
30% |
|
Stock Award (new) Four-year ratable vesting |
|
0% |
|
As a result of the changes to Mr. Nadellas compensation for fiscal year 2022, over 95% of his compensation is performance-based.
2021 vs. 2022 CEO Pay Mix
|
||||
|
38 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
ESG Role in Annual Cash Incentive
In our meetings with investors, we heard requests for additional clarity on our approach to including ESG commitments in our executive compensation program. Our annual cash incentive has included an assessment of CEO and SLT progress on culture and diversity and inclusion since 2016, signaling Microsofts early leadership in linking ESG measures to executive compensation. With senior managements focus on achieving Microsofts ambitious carbon reduction commitments, our annual cash incentive also includes an assessment of progress on sustainability. Beginning with fiscal year 2022, we renamed the Culture & Organizational Leadership category of the operational assessment component of the annual cash incentive as the Culture, Diversity & Sustainability category to enhance clarity on how ESG results affect the pay of our named executives. Now, all ESG results are considered under this category. We continue to seek feedback from shareholders and compensation experts as we thoughtfully consider future enhancements that connect executive compensation to Microsofts environmental and social commitments.
Our Compensation Committee establishes the design of our executive compensation program. After considering Mr. Nadellas recommendations, our Compensation Committee also approves the annual target compensation (base salaries, target cash incentives, and equity incentive compensation) for our Named Executives, except Mr. Nadella. After considering the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, the independent members of our Board approved Mr. Nadellas base salary, target cash incentive, and target performance stock award, providing no time-based stock awards for fiscal year 2022.
Our Compensation Committee also retains, and seeks the advice of, Pay Governance, an executive compensation consulting firm that is independent of management. See Part 1 Governance and our Board of Directors Board Committees for more information on Pay Governances role and independence as an advisor to the Compensation Committee.
Executive Compensation Philosophy
We design our executive compensation program to attract, motivate, and retain the key executives who drive our success and industry leadership while considering individual and Company performance and alignment with the long-term interests of our shareholders. We achieve our objectives through a compensation program that:
| Provides a competitive total pay opportunity that takes into account our relative scale and performance |
| Delivers a majority of our executives pay through performance-based incentives |
| Provides strong alignment with our shareholders, with at least 70% of the annual target compensation opportunity for our Named Executives delivered in the form of equity awards, with average across all Named Executives of over 80% |
| Focuses on the long-term through equity awards with multi-year vesting or performance requirements |
| Does not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking, assisted by our stock ownership policy and executive compensation recovery (clawback) policy |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
39 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Compensation Best Practices
|
||||
What We Do
|
What We Dont Do
| |
Maintain a stock ownership policy that reinforces the alignment of executive officer and shareholder interests (including requiring stock ownership of 15x base salary for the CEO)
Have a strong executive compensation recovery (clawback) policy to ensure accountability
Promote long-term focus through multi-year vesting and performance requirements
Prohibit pledging, hedging, and trading in derivatives of Microsoft securities
Retain an independent compensation consultant
Solicit investor feedback on our compensation program and potential enhancements through an extensive shareholder engagement program
Settle all long-term incentives in Microsoft stock |
No excessive perquisites (e.g., no executive-only club memberships or medical benefits), and no tax gross-ups
No employment agreements
No change in control payments or benefits
No executive-only retirement programs
No guaranteed bonuses
No dividends paid on unvested stock awards
No encouragement of unnecessary and excessive risk taking | |
Competitive Pay
We compete for senior executive talent with global information technology companies, large market capitalization U.S. companies, and smaller, high-growth technology businesses, depending on the role. The current technology labor market is hyper-competitive with demand growing faster than the supply of specialized technical talent, resulting in significant increases in compensation at many of the companies with which we compete for this talent. The same conditions exist in the market for executive-level talent that can provide innovative leadership while managing at a global scale across several complex businesses. We expect these trends to continue and will work to ensure our approach to executive compensation is responsive to evolving market conditions.
Approach to Compensation Benchmarking
To ensure that our Board and Compensation Committee have current information to set appropriate compensation levels, we conduct an executive compensation market analysis each year that draws from third-party compensation surveys and publicly available data for a group of peer companies. We supplement this analysis with additional market information specific to each executives role and responsibilities, including information gleaned from our experience recruiting for executive positions at Microsoft. While this market analysis and supplemental data inform the decisions of the independent members of our Board and our Compensation Committee on the range of compensation opportunities, we do not tie Named Executive compensation to specific market percentiles. Because other companies actively recruit our executives to fill CEO and other senior leadership positions, we supplement market information with data on external opportunities potentially available to our executives. We also consider the relationship of annual target compensation among internal peers.
In setting our fiscal year 2022 executive compensation program design and compensation levels, we considered pay practices at the largest technology and general industry companies that our Compensation Committee believes are led by executives with similarly complex roles and responsibilities. Our Compensation Committee also screened these companies to ensure they had a significant presence outside the U.S. and excluded companies in the financial services sector because of the different regulatory environment in which they operate.
40 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Peer Group Used for Fiscal Year 2022 Pay Analysis
For fiscal year 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed the evolution of our business against our historical peer group, and as a result approved the use of two peer groups to better reflect the differentiated business, talent and, in some cases, pay models, across sectors:
| Primary Peer Group of bellwether technology companies, which reflect Microsofts more direct competitors for executive talent |
| Secondary Peer Group of large cap general industry companies, which reflect the complexities of operating large, global, innovative businesses and Microsofts broader competition for executive talent |
The companies in the fiscal year 2022 peer groups are:
Primary Peer Group Technology
Adobe Alphabet |
Amazon Apple |
Cisco Systems IBM |
Intel Meta |
Oracle Qualcomm |
Salesforce |
Secondary Peer Group General Industry
Accenture AT&T |
Comcast Honeywell |
Johnson & Johnson Merck |
Pfizer Procter & Gamble |
Tesla Walt Disney |
Verizon |
Given Microsofts significant scale and growth, Microsoft is larger than the typical company in both peer groups, which is a factor when we set executive pay. The following charts show Microsofts position within the combined peer groups on the two screening criteria. Data is presented in billions as of August 12, 2022, with annual revenue based on the most recent publicly reported fiscal year-end data.
Performance-Based Pay and Goal Setting
Our incentive compensation arrangements are tied to specific performance measures that drive long-term performance and value creation. For fiscal year 2022:
| Over 95% of our CEOs annual target compensation opportunity was performance-based and over 50% of the total pay opportunity for other Named Executives was performance-based |
| 70% of our CEOs annual cash incentive was tied to achieving pre-established financial metric targets (50% for our other Named Executives) |
| 100% of our CEOs annual target equity opportunity was delivered in the form of a performance-based stock award (50% for our other Named Executives), with payouts based on achievement against pre-established quantitative performance metrics |
| Management and our Compensation Committee discussed in detail the metrics that determine performance stock awards to ensure they are leading indicators that will drive long-term performance and value creation. The Committee establishes rigorous goals for each metric that require significant year-over-year improvement in order for target awards to be earned |
| Performance stock awards include a relative TSR modifier to strengthen the alignment of the interests of our Named Executives with the long-term interests of our shareholders; in order for the TSR modifier to affect the performance stock awards positively, our relative TSR must be above the peer company 60th percentile |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
41 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Our Compensation Committee sets cash incentive and performance stock award (PSA) metric targets at the levels established, after review and engagement by the Board, for internal budgeting purposes. These targets are intended to be challenging but achievable. Our Compensation Committee then determines thresholds, maximums, and interim payout levels after considering historical data, upside/downside scenarios, sensitivity analysis, and year-over-year growth comparisons, to ensure rigorous alignment of payouts to performance. We set thresholds that we believe are reasonably achievable and maximums that we believe can be reached only with exceptional performance. Our Compensation Committee actively reviews the appropriateness of payout thresholds and maximums for each metric. Our Compensation Committee focuses on ensuring that our challenging goals, when achieved, will result in shareholder value creation and, historically, our performance on these challenging goals has led to substantial returns to our shareholders.
Pay Mix
Over 95% of the annual target compensation opportunity for the CEO is performance-based and over 50% for our other Named Executives. All Named Executive Officers had at least 70% of the annual target compensation delivered in the form of equity awards, with average across all Named Executives over 80%, to incentivize a long-term focus and align their interests with those of our shareholders.
Fiscal Year 2022 Pay Mix
|
||||
|
Section 4 Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Program Design
Consistent with our philosophy, the compensation program for our Named Executives in fiscal year 2022 consisted of an annual base salary plus annual cash and equity incentives awarded under our Executive Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan).
Annual cash incentives were performance-based, with 70% determined formulaically based on achievement against pre-established financial targets for our CEO (50% for our other Named Executives) and 30% determined based on operational performance in three weighted performance categories for our CEO (50% for our other Named Executives). Our Compensation Committee and the independent members of our Board believe this strengthens our CEOs accountability to achieving results on the objective financial metrics that most closely align with our business strategy.
Equity incentives under the Incentive Plan were allocated 100% to target PSAs for our CEO. Equity incentives under the Incentive Plan were allocated 50% to target PSAs and 50% to stock awards with four-year vesting (SAs) for our other Named Executives. Our Compensation Committee and the independent members of our Board believed the 100% PSA level for our CEO will strengthen the alignment of his pay and Microsofts long-term performance, while the 50/50 balance between PSAs and SAs appropriately supported our long-term business goals and long-term retention incentives for our other Named Executives.
42 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Base Salaries
Our Named Executives base salaries align with the scope and complexity of their roles, their capabilities, and with prevailing market conditions.
Annual Cash Incentives
Cash incentives are determined in two performance categories for our CEO and other Named Executives (NEOs), as follows:
* | Incentive Plan Revenue and Incentive Plan Operating Income are non-GAAP financial measures defined on page 46. |
Financial
We include financial results in our cash incentive to measure our success in meeting internal annual financial performance goals for revenue and profitability that we believe drive long-term value creation.
For fiscal year 2022, the financial formulaic portion of the annual cash incentives was determined based on meeting pre-established performance targets for Incentive Plan Revenue and Incentive Plan Operating Income. The fiscal year 2022 Incentive Plan Revenue and Incentive Plan Operating Income performance targets were based on meeting the Companys fiscal year 2022 internal operating budget.
Operational Assessment
The operational assessment portion of each Named Executives fiscal year 2022 annual cash incentives was determined based on evaluation of their individual contributions to the furtherance of financial, operational, strategic, and ESG indicators in three performance categories. The performance indicators varied based on the Named Executives responsibilities and the function or group he or she leads, and may have included (in alphabetical order in each category):
|
Product & Strategy
|
|
Customers & Stakeholders
|
|
Culture, Diversity & Sustainability
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency and productivity
Innovation
Product development and implementation of strategic roadmap
Quality
Revenue, consumption, and market share
|
Customer and partner engagement and outreach
Customer satisfaction
Developer engagement
|
Compliance and integrity
Culture
Diversity and inclusion
Organizational health
Sustainability and carbon reduction |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
43 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
For Mr. Nadella, the independent members of our Board also considered:
| Input from Microsofts senior executives about Mr. Nadellas leadership |
| The scorecard we use to measure performance against Microsofts annual business plan |
| Mr. Nadellas evaluation of Microsofts and his individual performance over the past fiscal year |
Equity Compensation
Under the Incentive Plan, each year our Named Executives receive PSAs and our Named Executives, other than Mr. Nadella, receive SAs.
Performance Stock Awards
PSAs are designed to encourage our executives to achieve rigorous goals in key performance metrics to drive long-term performance and value creation.
Due to the dynamic nature of our business and the specificity in the performance metrics that are chosen under our PSA program, we believe that measuring performance annually over our three-year performance period and modifying awards based on our three-year relative TSR provides the most accurate assessment of Microsofts long-term trajectory and performance achievements.
Fiscal Year 2022 Performance Stock Award Metrics and Weights
Fiscal year 2022 PSA metrics are strategic measures that drive long-term performance and value creation. Targets for the PSA metrics are set at the target levels established under Microsofts fiscal year business plan and are intended to be difficult but attainable, and additional information about our goal-setting process is on pages 41-42. The metrics and weights used for fiscal year 2022 are in the table below.
Fiscal Year 2022 PSA Metrics
|
||||
Performance Metrics | Description | Weights | ||||||||
Microsoft Cloud Revenue* | Revenue from Azure and other cloud services, Office 365 Commercial, the commercial portion of LinkedIn, Dynamics 365, and other commercial cloud properties | 30% | ||||||||
Microsoft Cloud Subscribers Growth |
Paid seats for current or new per-user SaaS cloud services primarily in commercial customer segment | 20% | ||||||||
Teams Monthly Active Usage Growth | Unique monthly active users of Teams in Enterprise, Corporate, Small and Medium Business, Education, and Consumer | 20% | ||||||||
Xbox Game Pass Subscribers Growth | Current number of paid Game Pass Subscriptions (Console, PC, Ultimate) | 10% | ||||||||
Windows OEM Revenue* Growth | Revenue from sales of Windows Pro and non-Pro licenses sold through the OEM channel | 10% | ||||||||
LinkedIn Sessions | Measure of member visits as a leading indicator of the overall quality of the LinkedIn member experience and opportunity for members to realize their economic opportunity | 10% | ||||||||
* Microsoft Cloud Revenue and Windows OEM Revenue Growth, when used as PSA metrics in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, are non-GAAP financial measures defined on page 51.
|
44 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
The fiscal year 2022 PSA metrics were used to establish performance goals for (i) year 3 of the 2020 PSAs, (ii) year 2 of the 2021 PSAs, and (iii) year 1 of the 2022 PSAs, as shown below.
PSA Metrics
|
||||
| ||||
Our fiscal year 2022 PSA metric results can be found on pages 51-52 below. | ||||
Stock Awards
Stock awards were granted under the Incentive Plan in September 2021 for shares of Microsoft common stock. These stock awards vest over four years, with 25% vesting on August 31, 2022 and 12.5% each six-months thereafter, to support long-term focus and align with shareholders interests. Vesting is subject to continued employment except as described on pages 52-53 below.
On-Hire Compensation
In connection with his employment as our Executive Vice President, Business Development, Strategy, and Ventures on November 11, 2020, our Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Young an on-hire cash bonus with a second $1,500,000 installment payable within 30 days after the first anniversary of his employment start date. This installment is repayable to Microsoft if Mr. Young resigns his employment, or his employment is terminated for misconduct prior to the second anniversary of his employment start date.
No Other Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation
During fiscal year 2022, the Compensation Committee and independent members of our Board awarded no other compensation to our Named Executives.
Section 5 Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Decisions
Our Named Executives were awarded the following compensation in fiscal year 2022:
Fiscal Year 2022 Base Salaries
As part of the annual review of target compensation opportunities, our Compensation Committee and, for Mr. Nadella, the independent members of our Board, reviewed the base salaries of our Named Executives in September 2021. The independent members of our Board did not increase the base salary of $2.5 million for Mr. Nadella, which it continued to believe was reasonable and appropriate given his role, capabilities, and experience, as well as the Companys relative scale and performance. Our Compensation Committee approved base salaries of $1 million for Mr. Smith and $960,000 for Mr. Althoff, based on a competitive market review of their roles and contributions. The Committee did not change the base salaries of Ms. Hood or Mr. Young.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
45 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Fiscal Year 2022 Cash Incentive Awards
We did not increase our target cash incentive opportunities in fiscal year 2022 as a percentage of base salary. For fiscal year 2022, these opportunities were: Mr. Nadella 300%; Ms. Hood 250%; Mr. Smith 250%; and Mr. Young 200%. In connection with Mr. Althoffs appointment to Chief Commercial Officer the Compensation Committee set Mr. Althoffs target cash incentive opportunity at 250%.
Our Compensation Committee and, for Mr. Nadella, the independent members of our Board, determined the fiscal year 2022 cash incentive awards. These were based on two performance categories: financial results and operational performance results.
Final results under each portion of the cash incentive, and the resulting awards, were as follows:
|
Nadella | Hood | Althoff | Smith | Young | |||||||||||||||
Financial results (70% CEO / 50% other NEOs) |
121.03% | 121.03% | 121.03% | 121.03% | 121.03% | |||||||||||||||
Operational results (30% CEO / 50% other NEOs) |
165.00% | 165.00% | 163.34% | 165.00% | 130.00% | |||||||||||||||
Total FY22 cash incentive (% of target) |
134.22% | 143.02% | 142.19% | 143.02% | 125.52% | |||||||||||||||
Total FY22 cash incentive ($) |
$10,066,500 | $3,575,500 | $3,412,560 | $3,551,664 | $2,133,840 |
Financial Results
The fiscal year 2022 financial performance measures are shown below, resulting in a weighted payout of 121.03%. We note that our Incentive Plan Revenue result was at 99.7% of target while achieving a 18.37% fiscal year 2022 growth rate, demonstrating our commitment to rigorous goal setting.
Financial Results ($ in billions) |
FY21 Actual |
FY22 Threshold |
FY22 Target |
FY22 Maximum |
FY22 Actual |
FY22 Growth Rate |
||||||||||||||||||
FY22 Incentive Plan Revenue |
$174.59 | $194.78 | $207.21 | $218.61 | $206.67 | 18.37% | ||||||||||||||||||
FY22 Incentive Plan Operating Income |
$71.53 | $75.08 | $82.02 | $92.67 | $86.73 | 21.25% |
Incentive Plan Revenue and Incentive Plan Operating Income are non-GAAP financial measures. We calculate Incentive Plan Revenue by adjusting GAAP Revenue for (1) the net impact of revenue deferrals, (2) credits and incentives, (3) the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations, and (4) the impact of the March 2022 acquisition of Nuance Communications, Inc. (Nuance). We calculate Incentive Plan Operating Income by adjusting GAAP Operating Income for the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations and the impact of the March 2022 acquisition of Nuance. We exclude the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations on a constant dollar basis by converting current period non-GAAP (i.e., adjusted for the items in the preceding two sentences) results for entities reporting in currencies other than U.S. dollars into U.S. dollars using constant exchange rates, which are determined at the outset of the current period, rather than the actual exchange rates in effect during the respective periods. These Incentive Plan financial metrics differ from the non-GAAP financial results we report in our quarterly earnings release materials. They should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, the measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
46 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Operational Results
Satya Nadella
The key results influencing the Compensation Committee and the independent members of our Board decisions on the operational performance portion of Mr. Nadellas cash incentive are set forth below. Results are out of a possible 200% in each category.
Average Financial: 121.03% |
+ | Average Operational: 165% |
= | Overall Bonus: 134.22% |
Product & Strategy (10%)
|
160% | |||
Following outstanding performance in fiscal year 2021, Mr. Nadella again led Microsoft to achieve strong revenue growth across business lines, including 18% growth in Office 365 Commercial, 11% growth in Windows Commercial Products and cloud services driven by demand for Microsoft 365, 39% growth in Dynamics 365, 45% growth in Azure and other cloud services, 34% growth for LinkedIn, and our security business reaching annualized revenue of over $15 billion. In the area of security, Microsoft was the only firm recognized as best-in-breed across 19 Gartner, Forrester, and IDC categories, with over 70 billion threats stopped. In addition, Microsoft continued its acceleration of Customer Solution Areas (CSAs) across commercial and consumer segments. As the world explored what it would mean to return to work, Microsoft deepened its position with enterprises as the leading provider of modern work solutions evidenced by the growth in Microsoft 365 and Teams. Mr. Nadellas leadership has also resulted in higher customer adoption and satisfaction, with Windows 11 achieving the highest satisfaction rate in its history. Xbox engaged more gamers across console, PC and mobile, delivering over 25 million Game Pass subscriptions and winning console share three quarters in a row. Our planned acquisition of Activision Blizzard amplifies our commitment to delivering world-class content to gamers wherever they choose to play. Under Mr. Nadellas leadership in fiscal year 2022, Microsoft made signfiicant strides in threat intelligence and strengthening the Microsoft brand in security. Microsoft expanded its lead in global infrastructure and resiliency with 60+ available cloud regions. Mr. Nadella led substantial progress in documenting our strategy and facilitating frequent and open discussions across the board and management. Mr. Nadellas leadership in fiscal year 2022 enhanced for all stakeholders the clarity of Microsofts product/strategy vision.
| ||||
Customers & Stakeholders (10%)
|
170% | |||
Mr. Nadella led Microsoft to make 21 new investments and 39 follow-on investments many in new growth areas to enable Microsoft to retain its prominence in usage and share growth across existing and new customers. During fiscal year 2022, Microsoft launched and expanded partnerships and collaborations with clients such as FedEx, Boeing, and the NBA to create more value by influencing strategy, develop new growth areas, and guide future decisions. Mr. Nadella led expansion into new categories, including investments in Consensys (web3) and WAYVE (autonomous transport), which is scaling the development of AI-based models for autonomous vehicles using Azure. Microsoft advanced its position as the preferred, or primary, cloud partner for many organizations across industries. Microsoft closed the Nuance acquisition, which is creating new growth opportunities that the Company is leveraging across platform solutions. Mr. Nadella continued Microsofts leadership as a responsible global brand, ranking #1 on Forbes 2021 The Just 100 List for responsibility to workers, customers, communities, shareholders, and the environment. Microsoft enhanced its brand and presence through successful marketing, branding, and product placement initiatives across customer interest areas and platforms.
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
47 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Culture, Diversity & Sustainability (10%)
|
165% | |||
Mr. Nadella led the Company in its industry-leading initiatives that advanced our position as a trusted global tech company in the emerging era of regulation. Mr. Nadella led Microsofts cross-company response in support and defense of the Ukraine government and furthered the Companys good government relationships. Microsoft strengthened our employee value proposition through enhanced compensation and, importantly, benefits. Under Mr. Nadellas leadership, we achieved higher employee retention, particularly of our highest potential and most highly performing colleagues. Mr. Nadellas focus on Microsofts role in the broader world and fulfilling the Companys desire to lead across important global priorities were pronounced in fiscal year 2022. Microsoft played a pivotal role in protecting against cybersecurity threats. The Company is making strong progress on our commitments to environmental sustainability, where Microsoft is on-track to meet 2025 and 2030 commitments across carbon, water, and waste. Microsoft reduced its Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 17% while growing revenue, and is on the path to 100% direct renewable energy by 2025. Under Mr. Nadellas leadership, core Microsoft (83.9% of the worldwide Microsoft workforce, excluding minimally integrated companies, joint ventures, or newly acquired companies) saw the strongest progress in the last five years in building a more diverse workforce. These advances were made across several demographic groups, with overall representation of women surpassing 30%, at 30.7% globally (+1.0ppts). Other progress includes year-over-year U.S. employee representation growth for: Asian 35.8% (+0.3ppts); Hispanic and Latinx 7.6% (+0.6ppts); Black and African American 6.6% (+0.9ppts); and Multiracial 2.6% (+0.1ppts). Mr. Nadella has continued to lead the Company to fulfilling its racial equity initiative (REI) commitments by 2025, which includes doubling the number of Black and African American and Hispanic and Latinx people managers, senior individual contributors and senior leaders. We are 116.0% of the way to our 2025 commitment to double the number of Black and African American people managers below Director level and 92.0% of the way for Directors, Partners and Executives. For Hispanic and Latinx, we are 46.5% of the way to our 2025 commitment for people managers below Director level and 57.6% of the way for Directors, Partners, and Executives. Mr. Nadella continues to lead efforts to ensure that Microsofts culture evolves while staying true to our values. He is driving excellence in the near-term and ensuring that the Company develops the talent needed to lead Microsoft into the future. |
Other Named Executives
The key results influencing our Compensation Committees decisions on the operational performance category portion of the cash incentive for the other Named Executives are summarized below.
Amy Hood, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| Delivered strong financial performance and management with double digit revenue growth of 18% and operating income growth of 19%, and returned total cash to shareholders of $46.6 billion through share repurchases and dividends. |
| Strengthened investor relations and successfully communicated the next key business opportunities to drive future growth |
| Continued strong leadership focus on strategic capital allocation, prioritization, and executional excellence |
| Drove synergies between our own products and services and creating a portfolio of industry clouds to multiply opportunities for customers to realize value. |
| Led sustainability efforts through investments in the companys $1 billion Climate Innovation Fund, developing a company-wide carbon reduction accountability model, and creation of the renewable energy portfolio |
| Consistent focus on diversity and inclusion and ongoing leadership to achieve our Racial Equity Initiative commitment |
48 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Judson B. Althoff, Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer
| Took on increased role in FY22 to lead the Microsoft Customer & Partner Solutions (MCAPS) group in delivering strong financial performance contributing to Microsofts 18% growth in revenue. |
| Exemplified customer obsession through hundreds of customer and partner engagements. Drove further organizational alignment to industry solution-oriented capabilities to provide customized digital transformation consultation. |
| Continued focus on embedding diversity and inclusion conversations and learning opportunities in the field culture. Made strides in strengthening diversity across the leadership bench. |
| Launched Microsoft Cloud for Sustainability within our product portfolio to enable customers to transform their business through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting and analytics capabilities, and drove solid progress towards reducing MCAPS carbon scope 3 emissions, on track against goals. |
| Strengthened our leadership bench by recruiting and promoting individuals with deep industry and sales leadership expertise from diverse backgrounds. |
Bradford L. Smith, Vice Chair and President
| Launched a new initiative to combat disinformation and foreign cyber influence operations, and led the response to the war in Ukraine to defend against cybersecurity attacks. |
| Supported important customer privacy protections in the new Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework and committed to enhancing how we handle legal requests for customer data and providing further support for individuals concerned about their rights. |
| Advanced skills for jobs initiatives and launched a national campaign with U.S. community colleges to help skill and recruit into the cybersecurity workforce 250,000 people by 2025, representing half of the countrys workforce shortage. Overall skilling efforts have reached over 30 million people in 249 countries and territories, and specifically for fiscal year 2022, 5.8 million people were trained for jobs and livelihood opportunities in the digital economy. |
| Continued efforts to protect fundamental rights including the Racial Equity Initiative and the companys support for access to the internet. Advanced broadband coverage and exceeded our goal of reaching 3 million unserved rural Americans and 40 million unserved people around the world. |
| Released the Responsible AI Standard, a set of company-wide rules that help to ensure we are developing and deploying AI technology consistent with our AI principles of fairness, reliability & safety, privacy & security, inclusiveness, transparency, and accountability. |
| Joined the Carbon Call to lead the efforts to develop reliable and interoperable carbon accounting methodology standards, while making strong progress towards environmental sustainability goals, including reducing scope 1 and 2 emissions by 17 percent while Microsofts revenue grew ~18%. |
Christopher D. Young, Executive Vice President, Business Development, Strategy, and Ventures
| Spearheaded efforts to identify new categories of future growth for Microsoft in partnership with Senior Leadership Team peers, as well as through investments via the M12 Venture Fund. |
| Partnered with other technology providers to remove friction and accelerate customers digital transformations and helped lead strategic acquisitions to broaden our reach, such as the Xandr acquisition, and the partnership with Netflix as their global advertising technology and sales partner. |
| Demonstrated leadership in numerous customer and partner engagements, strengthening existing relationships and growing business opportunities with emerging technology company leadership. |
| Drove solid progress towards reducing Business Development, Strategy and Ventures carbon scope 3 emissions, on track against goals. |
| Championed diversity and inclusion, increased representation within the organization and served as active ally to employee resource groups. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
49 |
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
Fiscal Year 2022 Stock Awards
The fiscal year 2022 PSAs and SAs granted to our Named Executives under the Incentive Plan are listed below.
Named Executive |
PSAs (Target Number of Shares)¹ |
SAs (Number of Shares)² |
Aggregate Target Award Value³ ($) | |||||||
Satya Nadella |
165,629 | 0 | 50,000,000 | |||||||
Amy E. Hood |
28,986 | 28,986 | 17,500,000 | |||||||
Judson B. Althoff |
20,870 | 20,870 | 12,600,000 | |||||||
Bradford L. Smith |
25,673 | 25,673 | 15,500,000 | |||||||
Christopher D. Young |
12,423 | 12,423 | 7,500,000 |
(1) | The PSAs vest in full following the end of the three-year performance period, with the number of shares earned determined based on performance against goals set for each year in the period and relative TSR results for the period. |
(2) | The SAs vest 25% on August 31, 2023 and 12.5% each six months thereafter until fully vested. Vesting is subject to continued employment except as described on pages 52-53 below. |
(3) | Awarded value (in dollars) was converted to shares using the closing share price on August 31, 2021, rounded up to a whole number. |
The amounts listed in the table above for fiscal year 2022 PSAs will not match the amounts in the Stock Awards column in the Summary Compensation Table or the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. Because the grant date of a PSA occurs when the performance targets are set, and targets under our PSA awards are established annually, SAs listed in the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards table include portions of current and prior year PSA awards, as described in more detail in Note (2) to the Summary Compensation Table on page 55.
Fiscal Year 2020 PSAs (Completed Performance Period)
Our Compensation Committee (and for Mr. Nadella, the independent members of our Board) granted PSAs in fiscal year 2020 that pay out based on specific pre-established, performance goals and strategic performance objectives tied to creating long-term shareholder value as well as our TSR performance relative to the S&P 500. Performance was measured over the three-fiscal year performance period ending June 30, 2022.
50 |
|
1 |
GOVERNANCE AND
|
2 |
NAMED |
3 |
AUDIT |
4 |
PROPOSALS TO |
5 |
INFORMATION | |||||||||
|
The actual performance under the fiscal year 2020 PSAs reflected the strong business achievement on core metrics and Microsofts relative TSR during this period. Performance on the core metrics under these PSAs is shown in the following table:
Fiscal Year 2020 PSA Core Metric Payout Percentages
|
||||
|
Metric (FY20-FY22) |
Weight | FY20 Payout |
|
Weight | FY21 Payout |
Weight | FY22 Payout |
| |||||||||||||
|
Microsoft Cloud Revenue1 |
|
35% |
|
|
98.15% |
|
H1 - 16.5% | 121.69% | 30% |
126.39% |
| ||||||||||
|
H2 - 16.5% |
157.07% |
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
Microsoft Cloud Subscribers Growth2,3 |
34% | 107.35% |
|
32% | 196.54% | 20% | 68.91% |
| |||||||||||||
|
Teams Monthly Active Usage Growth3 |
10% | 200.00% |
|
20% | 81.36% | 20% | 50.92% |
| |||||||||||||
|
Xbox Game Pass Subscribers Growth3 |
7% | 147.95% |
|
5% | 82.28% | 10% | 56.80% |
| |||||||||||||
|
Surface Revenue |
|
7% |
|
|
90.10% |
|
|
H1 - 2.5% | 200% | N/A |
N/A |
| |||||||||
|
|
H2 - 2.5% |
0% |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
Windows OEM Revenue Growth3 |
N/A | N/A |
|
N/A | N/A | 10% | 191.15% |
| |||||||||||||
|
LinkedIn Sessions |
7% | 129.64% |
|
5% | 195.97% | 10% | 90.66% |
| |||||||||||||
|
Weighted Performance for FY |
|
116.59% |
|
|
144.07% |
|
95.75% |
| |||||||||||||
|
Core Metric Performance (average of FY20, FY21, and FY22 performance) |
|
|
118.80% |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
(1) Known as Commercial Cloud Revenue before FY22. (2) Known as Commercial Cloud Subscribers before FY22. (3) Metrics were established as unit of measure or dollar value before FY22. For competitive reasons, results for those years are expressed in terms of year-over-year growth. Beginning in FY22 metrics were defined as a growth percentage.
|
|
Fiscal Year 2020 PSA Core Metric Performance Results1
|
||||
|
Metric (FY20-FY22) |
Weight | FY20 Target/ Actual Achievement |
|
Weight | FY21 Target/ Actual Achievement |
Weight | FY22 Target/ Actual Achievement |
| |||||||||||
|
Microsoft Cloud Revenue2 |
35% |
$51.90B / $51.80B |
H1 - 16.5% | $30.78B / $31.19B | 30% |
$91.49B / $93.48B |
| ||||||||||||
|